Support for collecting the 2005 data was provided by Atlantic Philanthropies in a grant to the Center for Democracy and the Third Sector (CDATS) at Georgetown University, and by the Weidenbaum Center at Washington University in St. Louis. Marc Morjé Howard, with the assistance of James L. Gibson, was primarily responsible for executing that survey. We greatly appreciate Howard's untiring efforts on the 2005 project, as well as the support for this research Steven S. Smith provided. We also appreciate the research assistance of Marc Hendershot, Jessica Flanigan, and Christina Boyd on that project. For the subsequent two interviews of the 2005–2006 panel survey, support was provided by the Law and Social Sciences Program of the National Science Foundation (SES-0553156). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Additional funding for the 2006 survey was provided by the Mershon Center for International Security Studies of the Ohio State University (“The Legitimacy of the Supreme Court and Critical Nominations”), to whom we are much indebted. We much appreciate the comments of Jesse Atencio on an earlier version of this article. Please address correspondence to James L. Gibson, Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public Policy, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1063, 170 Seigle Hall, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899; e-mail: jgibson@wustl.edu.
Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court?
Article first published online: 16 MAR 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00432.x
© 2011 Law and Society Association
Additional Information
How to Cite
Gibson, J. L. and Caldeira, G. A. (2011), Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court?. Law & Society Review, 45: 195–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00432.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 16 MAR 2011
- Article first published online: 16 MAR 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Options for accessing this content:
- If you have access to this content through a society membership, please first log in to your society website.
- If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
- Login via other institutional login options http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/login-options.
- You can purchase online access to this Article for a 24-hour period (price varies by title)
- If you already have a Wiley Online Library or Wiley InterScience user account: login above and proceed to purchase the article.
- New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.
If your institution is a registered Wiley Online Library customer, you can log in under your institution's name to see our content. This access is provided by Shibboleth or Athens.
Type your institution's name in the box below. If your institution is a Wiley customer, it will appear in the list of suggested institutions.
Registered Users please login:
- Access your saved publications, articles and searches
- Manage your email alerts, orders and subscriptions
- Change your contact information, including your password
Please register to:
- Save publications, articles and searches
- Get email alerts
- Get all the benefits mentioned below!

1540-5893/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=e2a45b3327b313cdfe4d3c06ebdde1314770a209)
1540-5893/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=7b349b44a58ed586d9dd07897f7b080c491fd98a)
