For their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article, I thank Rosemary Batt, Jane Berger, Marya Besharov, Kate Bronfenbrenner, Ileen DeVault, Leslie Gates, Robin Hoover, Sidney Tarrow, Michele Williams, and the editors and anonymous reviewers of Law & Society Review. Please direct correspondence to Maria Lorena Cook, 368 Ives Hall, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-3901; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
“Humanitarian Aid Is Never a Crime”: Humanitarianism and Illegality in Migrant Advocacy
Article first published online: 19 SEP 2011
© 2011 Law and Society Association
Law & Society Review
Volume 45, Issue 3, pages 561–591, September 2011
How to Cite
Cook, M. L. (2011), “Humanitarian Aid Is Never a Crime”: Humanitarianism and Illegality in Migrant Advocacy. Law & Society Review, 45: 561–591. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00444.x
- Issue published online: 19 SEP 2011
- Article first published online: 19 SEP 2011
I analyze the case of humanitarian pro-migrant activists in southern Arizona between 2000 and 2010 to explore how contending groups wield law and legality claims in a dynamic policy environment. Humanitarian activists both evade and engage the law. They appeal to a higher law to elude charges that they are acting illegally, while seeking assurances that their actions are within the law. Law enforcement agents rely on the authority and technical neutrality of the law in redefining humanitarian aid as illegal, while expanding their own claims to carry out humanitarian work. This case study of advocacy on behalf of “illegal” migrants highlights how both activists and those who enforce the law redefine legality in strategic ways.