We wish to thank our Queen Mary colleagues, Roger Cotterrell and Prakash Shah, Michael King of Reading University, and Andrew Halpin of the National University of Singapore for their constructive comments on an earlier draft of this article. We also wish to thank the editors and reviewers of Law & Society Review. Please address correspondence to Richard Nobles, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; and David Schiff, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS; e-mail: email@example.com.
Using Systems Theory to Study Legal Pluralism: What Could Be Gained?
Article first published online: 21 MAY 2012
© 2012 Law and Society Association
Law & Society Review
Volume 46, Issue 2, pages 265–296, June 2012
How to Cite
Nobles, R. and Schiff, D. (2012), Using Systems Theory to Study Legal Pluralism: What Could Be Gained?. Law & Society Review, 46: 265–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00489.x
- Issue published online: 21 MAY 2012
- Article first published online: 21 MAY 2012
This article has been cited by:
- 1Legal Argumentation and Justice in Luhmann’s System Theory of Law, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 2014, 27, 2, 341,
- 2Problematic legal pluralism: causes and some potential ‘cures’, The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 2014, 46, 2, 193,
- 3Protected by pluralism? Grappling with multiple legal frameworks in groundwater governance, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2014, 11, 39, ,
- 4The complex nexus between informality and the law: Reconsidering unauthorised settlements in light of the concept of nomotropism, Geoforum, 2014, 51, 161, ,