Foundation (dissertation improvement grant number 49010) and the Clayman Institute at Stanford University. I thank Shelley Correll, David Grusky, Cecilia Ridgeway, and Paula Englnad for helpful comments and suggestions. Please direct all correspondence to Tamar Kricheli-Katz, The Buchman Faculty of Law and the Department of Sociology, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; e-mail: email@example.com.
Choice, Discrimination, and the Motherhood Penalty
Article first published online: 23 AUG 2012
© 2012 Law and Society Association
Law & Society Review
Volume 46, Issue 3, pages 557–587, September 2012
How to Cite
Kricheli-Katz, T. (2012), Choice, Discrimination, and the Motherhood Penalty. Law & Society Review, 46: 557–587. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00506.x
- Issue published online: 23 AUG 2012
- Article first published online: 23 AUG 2012
- Foundation. Grant Number: 49010
Recent studies have documented substantial penalties associated with motherhood and suggest that discrimination plays an important role in producing them. In this article, I argue that the degree to which motherhood is conceptualized as a choice affects the penalties associated with making this choice. Two methods are employed to evaluate this argument. The first method is an analysis of state differences in the wage penalties for motherhood, in which hierarchical linear modeling is used with data from the 1988–2004 Current Population Survey. The second method is a hiring experiment in a highly controlled setting. The wage analysis shows that, net of the usual individual and state-level factors that affect wages, mothers are penalized more in states where motherhood is perceived to be a woman's choice. The hiring experiment distinguishes between productivity-based and discrimination-based explanations for the penalty and provides strong evidence for a causal relationship between perceptions of choice and discrimination against mothers.