The author thanks the anonymous reviewers and the editors of this journal for their very useful feedback in crafting this article. She would also like to thank Justin McCrary and Calvin Morrill for their multifaceted assistance on the project, as well as Lauren Edelman, Jonathan Simon, and Jamie Rowen for their very helpful comments on later versions of the manuscript. Finally, the author would like to thank Malcolm Feeley for providing the impetus and inspiration to write this article, as well as for his many helpful comments on the various drafts. The author takes sole responsibility for any flaws found herein. Please direct all correspondence to Ashley T. Rubin, Jurisprudence & Social Policy Program, University of California, 2240 Piedmont Ave., Berkeley, CA 94720; e-mail: email@example.com.
The Unintended Consequences of Penal Reform: A Case Study of Penal Transportation in Eighteenth-Century London
Article first published online: 12 DEC 2012
© 2012 Law and Society Association
Law & Society Review
Volume 46, Issue 4, pages 815–851, December 2012
How to Cite
Rubin, A. T. (2012), The Unintended Consequences of Penal Reform: A Case Study of Penal Transportation in Eighteenth-Century London. Law & Society Review, 46: 815–851. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00518.x
- Issue published online: 12 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 12 DEC 2012
What were the consequences of penal transportation to the New World for eighteenth-century British criminal justice? Transportation has been described by scholars as either a replacement of the death penalty responsible for its decline, or a penal innovation responsible for punishing a multitude of people more severely than they would have been punished before. Using data from the Old Bailey Sessions Papers and the Parliamentary Papers, this study examines sentencing and execution trends in eighteenth-century London. It takes advantage of the natural experiment provided by the passage of the 1718 Transportation Act that made transportation available as a penal sentence, thus enabling one to assess the “effect” of transportation on penal trends. This study finds that the primary consequence of the adoption of transportation was to make the criminal justice net more dense by subjecting people to a more intense punishment. While it was also associated with a small decline in capital sentences for some types of offenders, the adoption of transportation was also associated with an increase in the rate at which condemned inmates were executed. The study closes with a discussion of the conditions that may lead to law's unintended consequences, including the mesh-thinning consequences observed here.