I thank Lisa Baldez, Brian Crisp, Mark Jones, Bill Mishler, Barbara Norrander, Harvey Palmer, Michelle Taylor-Robinson, and the three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on previous versions of this article. This is a revised version of a paper presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association and the 2003 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators
Article first published online: 21 JUN 2006
American Journal of Political Science
Volume 50, Issue 3, pages 570–585, July 2006
How to Cite
Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2006), Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 50: 570–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00202.x
- Issue published online: 21 JUN 2006
- Article first published online: 21 JUN 2006
This article examines the effect of gender on legislators' attitudes and bill initiation behavior in three Latin American countries—Argentina, Colombia, and Costa Rica. I argue that sex role changes in Latin America over the past 35 years have led to changes in how female legislators perceive their political roles, and consequently, changes in their attitudes and behavior. Specifically, female legislators will place higher priority than male legislators on women's issues and children/family concerns, but their attitudes in other areas, such as education, health, the economy, agriculture, and employment, will be similar. However, I expect that gender dynamics in the legislative arena lead to marginalization of women such that gender differences will emerge for bill initiation behavior where they did not appear for attitudes. I test this using a survey of legislators' issue preferences and archival data on the bills that legislators sponsor and find statistical support for the hypotheses.