SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abrahamson, Shirley S. 1984. “The Woman Has Robes: Four Questions. Golden Gate Law Review 14(3): 48999.
  • Allen, David W., and Diane E. Wall. 1993. “Role Orientations and Women State Supreme Court Justices. Judicature 77(3): 15665.
  • Artis, Julie E. 2004. “Judging the Best Interests of the Child: Judges' Accounts of the Tender Year Doctrine. Law and Society Review 38(4): 769806.
  • Avery, Derek R., Patrick F. McKay, and David C. Wilson. 2008. “What Are the Odds? How Demographic Similarity Affects the Prevalence of Perceived Employment Discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology 93(2): 23549.
  • Baldez, Lisa, Lee Epstein, and Andrew D. Martin. 2006. “Does the U.S. Constitution Need an ERA Journal of Legal Studies 35(1): 24383.
  • Beiner, Theresa M. 2002. “The Elusive (but Worthwhile) Quest for a Diverse Bench in the New Millenium. University of California Davis Law Review 36(3): 597617.
  • Berger, Joseph, Thomas L. Conner, and M. Hamit Fisek. 1974. Expectation States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program. Cambridge , MA : Winthrop.
  • Bianco, William T. 1997. “Reliable Source or Usual Suspects? Cue-taking, Information Transmission, and Legislative Commitees. Journal of Politics 59(3): 91324.
  • Brudney, James J., Sara Schiavoni, and Deborah J. Merrit. 1999. “Judicial Hostility Toward Labor Unions? Applying the Social Background Model to a Celebrated Concern. Ohio State Law Journal 60(5): 16751766.
  • Bussel, Daniel J. 2000. “Textualism's Failures: A Study of Overruled Bankruptcy Decisions. Vanderbilt Law Review 53(3): 887946.
  • Cameron, Charles, and Craig Cummings. 2003. “Diversity and Judicial Decision Making: Evidence from Affirmative Action Cases in the Federal Courts of Appeals, 1971-1999.” Paper presented at the Crafting and Operating Institutions conference, Yale University .
  • Carroll, Susan J. 1984. “Woman Candidates and Support for Feminist Concerns. Western Political Quarterly 37(2): 30723.
  • Clark, Mary L. 2004. “One Man's Token Is Another Woman's Breakthrough? The Appointment of the First Women Federal Judges. Villanova Law Review 49(3): 487548.
  • Cook, Beverly B. 1981. “Will Women Judges Make a Difference in Women's Legal Rights?” In Women, Power, and Political Systems, ed. MargheritaRendel. London : Croom Helm, 21639.
  • Cox, D. R. 1992. “Causality: Some Statistical Aspects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 155(2): 291301.
  • Cross, Frank B. 2007. Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Palo Alto , CA : Stanford University Press.
  • Crowe, Nancy. 1999. “The Effects of Judges' Sex and Race on Judicial Decision Making on the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 1981-1996.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago .
  • Dahlerup, Drude. 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics. New York : Routledge.
  • Davis, Sue. 1994. “Do Women Judges Speak ‘In a Different Voice?’ Carol Gilligan, Feminist Legal Theory, and the Ninth Circuit. Wisconsin Women's Law Journal 8(1): 14373.
  • Davis, Sue, Susan Haire, and Donald R. Songer. 1993. “Voting Behavior and Gender on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Judicature 77(3): 12933.
  • Dehejia, Rajeev H., and Sadek Wahba. 1999. “Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94(448): 105362.
  • Diamond, Alexis, and Jasjeet S. Sekhon. 2005. “Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Florida State University .
  • Dodson, Debra L. 2008. The Impact of Women in Congress. New York : Oxford University Press.
  • Epstein, Lee, Andrew D. Martin, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Chad Westerland. 2007. “The Judicial Common Space. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 23(2): 30325.
  • Epstein, Lee, Daniel E. Ho, Gary King, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2005. “The Supreme Court During Crisis. NYU Law Review 80(1): 1116.
  • Epstein, Lee, and Gary King. 2002. “The Rules of Inference. University of Chicago Law Review 69(4): 1133.
  • Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, and Andrew D. Martin. 2003. “The Norm of Prior Judicial Experience and Its Consequences for Career Diversity on the U.S. Supreme Court. California Law Review 91(4): 90366.
  • Farhang, Sean, and Gregory Wawro. 2004. “Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Minority Representation Under Panel Decision Making. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 20(2): 299330.
  • Federal Judicial Center. 2007. “Federal Judges Biographical Database.” http://www.fjc.gov/public/home.nsf/hisj.
  • Fowler, James H. 2006. “Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks. Political Analysis 14(4): 45687.
  • Giles, Michael W., Virginia A. Hettinger, and Todd Peppers. 2001. “Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas. Political Research Quarterly 54(3): 62341.
  • Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Greiner, D. James. 2008. “Causal Inference in Civil Rights Litigation. Harvard Law Review 122(2): 53398.
  • Greiner, D. James, and Donald B. Rubin. 2009. “Potential Outcomes and Immutable Characteristics.” Paper presented at the Applied Statistics Workshop, Harvard University.
  • Gryski, Gerard, Eleanor C. Main, and William J. Dixon. 1986. “Models of State High Court Decision Making in Sex Discrimination Cases. Journal of Politics 48(1): 14355.
  • Hettinger, Virginia A., Stefanie A. Lindquist, and Wendy L. Martinek. 2004. “Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. American Journal of Political Science 48(1): 12337.
  • Ho, Daniel E., Kosuke Imai, Gary King, and Elizabeth A. Stuart. 2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis 15(3): 199236.
  • Ho, Daniel E., Kosuke Imai, Gary King, and Elizabeth Stuart. 2006. “MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference.” R package version 2.2-11, http://gking.harvard.edu/matchit.
  • Holland, Paul W. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(396): 94570.
  • Imai, Kosuke. 2005. “Do Get-Out-The-Vote Calls Reduce Turnout? The Importance of Statistical Methods for Field Experiments. American Political Science Review 99(2): 283300.
  • Imai, Kosuke, and Teppei Yamamoto. 2010. “Causal Inference with Differential Measurement Error: Nonparametric Identification and Sensitivity Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 543–60.
  • King, Gary, and Langche Zeng. 2006. “The Dangers of Extreme Counterfactuals. Political Analysis 14(2): 13159.
  • King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press.
  • Kritzer, Herbert M., and Thomas M. Uhlman. 1977. “Sisterhood in the Courtroom: Sex of Judge and Defendant in Criminal Case Disposition. Social Sciences Journal 14(2): 7788.
  • Martin, Elaine. 1990. “Men and Women on the Bench: Vive la Difference Judicature 73(4): 2048.
  • Martin, Elaine, and Barry Pyle. 2000. “Gender, Race and Partisanship on the Michigan Supreme Court. Albany Law Review 63(4): 120536.
  • Martin, Elaine, and Barry Pyle. 2005. “State High Courts and Divorce: The Impact of Judicial Gender. University of Toledo Law Review 36(4): 92347.
  • Martin, Patricia Yancey, John R. Reynolds, and Shelley Keith. 2002. “Gender Bias and Feminist Consciousness among Judges and Attorneys: A Standpoint Theory Analysis. Signs 27(3): 665701.
  • Matthews, Donald R., and James A. Stimson. 1975. Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision-Making in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York : Wiley.
  • Maule, Linda. 2000. “A Different Voice: The Feminine Jurisprudence of the Minnesota State Supreme Court. Buffalo Women's Law Journal 9: 295316.
  • Neyman, Jerzy. 1935. “Statistical Problems in Agricultural Experimentation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society II(2): 107154.
  • Ostberg, C. L., and Matthew E. Wetstein. 2007. “In a Different Voice: Sex Difference in Economic Cases Decided by the Canadian Supreme Court.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association , Saskatoon , Saskatchewan.
  • Peresie, Jennifer L. 2005. “Female Judges Matter: Gender and Collegial Decisionmaking in the Federal Appellate Courts. Yale Law Journal 114(7): 175990.
  • Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley : University of California Press.
  • Posner, Richard A. 2008. How Judges Think. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press.
  • Rosenbaum, Paul R., and Donald B. Rubin. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika 70(1): 4155.
  • Rosenbaum, Paul R., and Donald B. Rubin. 1984. “Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79(387): 51624.
  • Rubin, Donald B. 1973. “Matching to Remove Bias in Observational Studies. Biometrics 29(1): 15983.
  • Rubin, Donald B. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 6(5): 688701.
  • Rubin, Donald B. 2006. Matched Sampling for Causal Effects. New York : Cambridge University Press.
  • Scherer, Nancy. 2005. Scoring Points: Politicians, Activists, and the Lower Federal Court Appointment Process. Palo Alto , CA : Stanford University Press.
  • Segal, Jennifer A. 2000. “Representative Decision Making on the Federal Bench: Clinton's District Court Appointees. Political Research Quarterly 53(1): 13750.
  • Sherry, Suzanna. 1986. “Civic Virtue and the Feminine Voice in Constitutional Adjudication. Virginia Law Review 72(3): 543616.
  • Sisk, Gregory C., Michael Heise, and Andrew P. Morriss. 1998. “Charting the Influences on the Judicial Mind: An Empirical Study of Judicial Reasoning. NYU Law Review 73(5): 13771500.
  • Smith, Herbert L. 1997. “Matching with Multiple Controls to Estimate Treatment Effects in Observational Studies. Sociological Methodology 27: 32553.
  • Steffensmeier, Darrell, and Chris Herbert. 1999. “Women and Men Policymakers: Does the Judge's Gender Affect the Sentencing of Criminal Defendants Social Forces 77(3): 116396.
  • Sullivan, Kathleen M. 2002. “Constitutionalizing Women's Equality. California Law Review 90(3): 73564.
  • Sunstein, Cass R., David Schkade, and Lisa Ellman. 2004. “Ideological Voting on Federal Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Investigation. Virginia Law Review 90(1): 30154.
  • Sunstein, Cass R., David Schkade, Lisa M. Ellman, and Andres Sawicki. 2006. Are Judges Political? An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judiciary. Washington , DC : Brookings.
  • Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
  • Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York : Oxford University Press.
  • Tobias, Carl. 1990. “The Gender Gap on the Federal Bench. Hofstra Law Review 19(1): 17184.
  • Walker, Thomas G., and Deborah J. Barrow. 1985. “The Diversification of the Federal Bench: Policy and Process Ramifications. Journal of Politics 47(2): 596617.
  • Winship, Christopher, and Stephen L. Morgan. 1999. “The Estimation of Causal Effects from Observational Data. Annual Review of Sociology 25(1): 659706.