Prior versions of this article were presented at Harvard University, the University of California, Davis, and the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM). I thank participants in those sessions as well as Andy Baker, Stephen Jessee, Chappell Lawson, Jay McCann, Daron Shaw, John Sides, Maryann Stewart, Nick Valentino, Mark M. Williams, the editor, and three anonymous reviewers for excellent comments on earlier drafts. Mary Slosar provided wonderful research assistance. All remaining errors are my own. See http://kgreene.webhost.utexas.edu/ for replication data and supporting materials. The Mexico 2006 Panel Study was supported by the National Science Foundation (SES-0517971) and Reforma newspaper. Data are available at http://web.mit.edu/polisci/research/mexico06/. Field research in Mexico was funded by a LLILAS Andrew W. Mellon Faculty Research Grant.
Campaign Persuasion and Nascent Partisanship in Mexico's New Democracy
Article first published online: 1 FEB 2011
©2011, Midwest Political Science Association
American Journal of Political Science
Volume 55, Issue 2, pages 398–416, April 2011
How to Cite
Greene, K. F. (2011), Campaign Persuasion and Nascent Partisanship in Mexico's New Democracy. American Journal of Political Science, 55: 398–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00497.x
- Issue published online: 1 APR 2011
- Article first published online: 1 FEB 2011
Despite ample evidence of preelection volatility in vote intentions in new democracies, scholars of comparative politics remain skeptical that campaigns affect election outcomes. Research on the United States provides a theoretical rationale for campaign effects, but shows little of it in practice in presidential elections because candidates’ media investments are about equal and voters’ accumulated political knowledge and partisan attachments make them resistant to persuasive messages. I vary these parameters by examining a new democracy where voters’ weaker partisan attachments and lower levels of political information magnify the effects of candidates’ asymmetric media investments to create large persuasion effects. The findings have implications for the generalizability of campaign effects theory to new democracies, the development of mass partisanship, candidate advertising strategies, and the specific outcome of Mexico's hotly contested 2006 presidential election. Data come primarily from the Mexico 2006 Panel Study.