SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Ulrich Sieberer, Wolfgang C. Müller, Aiming higher: the consequences of progressive ambition among MPs in European parliaments, European Political Science Review, 2015, 1

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Martin Ejnar Hansen, Zoltán Fazekas, All Votes are Equal? Significant Legislation and Party Competition in the Danish Folketing, Scandinavian Political Studies, 2015, 38, 3
  3. 3
    Markus Baumann, Marc Debus, Jochen Müller, Convictions and Signals in Parliamentary Speeches: Dáil Éireann Debates on Abortion in 2001 and 2013, Irish Political Studies, 2015, 30, 2, 199

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Michael Kellermann, Electoral Vulnerability, Constituency Focus, and Parliamentary Questions in the House of Commons, The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 2015, 17, 4
  5. 5
    Daniel Schwarz, Denise Traber, Kenneth Benoit, Estimating Intra-Party Preferences: Comparing Speeches to Votes, Political Science Research and Methods, 2015, 1

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    YOSHIKUNI ONO, Personal Attributes of Legislators and Parliamentary Behavior: An Analysis of Parliamentary Activities among Japanese Legislators, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2015, 16, 01, 68

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Markus Baumann, Marc Debus, Jochen Müller, Personal Characteristics of MPs and Legislative Behavior in Moral Policymaking, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2015, 40, 2
  8. 8
    Daniela Giannetti, Luca Pinto, Andrea Pedrazzani, Setting Parliamentary Calendars: How Parties Allocate Time for Plenary Debates on Bills, Political Studies, 2015, 63, 5
  9. 9
    Kentaro Fukumoto, Akitaka Matsuo, The Effects of Election Proximity on Participatory Shirking: The Staggered-Term Chamber as a Laboratory, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2015, 40, 4
  10. 10
    Andrea Ceron, The Politics of Fission: An Analysis of Faction Breakaways among Italian Parties (1946–2011), British Journal of Political Science, 2015, 45, 01, 121

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Marc Debus, Hanna Bäck, Der Einfluss von Mandatstyp und Wahlkreiseigenschaften auf die inhaltlichen Positionen in Parlamentsreden: Eine Untersuchung anhand der parlamentarischen Debatten im Deutschen Bundestag von 1998 bis 2002, Swiss Political Science Review, 2014, 20, 2
  12. 12
    Zachary Greene, Matthias Haber, Leadership Competition and Disagreement at Party National Congresses, British Journal of Political Science, 2014, 1

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Andrew C. Eggers, Arthur Spirling, Ministerial Responsiveness in Westminster Systems: Institutional Choices and House of Commons Debate, 1832–1915, American Journal of Political Science, 2014, 58, 4
  14. 14
    Sergi Pardos-Prado, Iñaki Sagarzazu, The Political Conditioning of Subjective Economic Evaluations: The Role of Party Discourse, British Journal of Political Science, 2014, 1

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Vibeke Wang, TRACING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES: A GROWTH CURVE ANALYSIS OF UGANDAN MPS’ ACTIVITY LEVELS IN PLENARY SESSIONS, 1998–2008, Representation, 2014, 50, 3, 365

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Stuart Soroka, Communication and Language Analysis in the Corporate World, 2014,

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Ulrich Sieberer, Elections in Western European parliaments, European Journal of Political Research, 2013, 52, 4
  18. 18
    Simon Hug, Mareike Kleine. 2013. Informal governance in the European Union. How governments make international organizations work. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), The Review of International Organizations, 2013, 8, 4, 525

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Nicole Kalaf-Hughes, Position-taking in House debate and the issue of immigration, Politics, Groups and Identities, 2013, 1, 4, 488

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Pär Zetterberg, The Dynamic Relationship between Gender Quotas and Political Institutions, Politics & Gender, 2013, 9, 03, 316

    CrossRef