Thomas B. Pepinsky is Assistant Professor of Government, Cornell University, 322 White Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 (email@example.com). R. William Liddle is Professor of Political Science, The Ohio State University, 2140 Derby Hall, 154 N. Oval Mall, Columbus, OH 43210-1373 (firstname.lastname@example.org). Saiful Mujani is Associate Professor, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Jl. Kertamukti No. 5 Cirendeu, Ciputat, 15419 Indonesia (email@example.com).
Testing Islam's Political Advantage: Evidence from Indonesia
Article first published online: 23 JAN 2012
© 2012, Midwest Political Science Association
American Journal of Political Science
Volume 56, Issue 3, pages 584–600, July 2012
How to Cite
Pepinsky, T. B., Liddle, R. W. and Mujani, S. (2012), Testing Islam's Political Advantage: Evidence from Indonesia. American Journal of Political Science, 56: 584–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00570.x
The study was funded in part by a grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation, Inc. We thank Dodi Ambardi, Jenny Epley, Allen Hicken, Yusaku Horiuchi, Eddy Malesky, John McCauley, Kevin Morrison, Burhanuddin Muhtadi, Michael Ross, Sunny Tanuwidjaja, and seminar participants at ANU, Cornell, Michigan, Nanyang Technological University, Lembaga Survei Indonesia, UCLA, and UCSD for valuable comments and discussion. We are responsible for all errors. Replication data are available at http://courses.cit.cornell.edu/tp253/data.html.
- Issue published online: 16 JUL 2012
- Article first published online: 23 JAN 2012
Across the Muslim world, Islamic political parties and social organizations have capitalized upon economic grievances to win votes and popular support. But existing research has been unable to disentangle the role of Islamic party ideology from programmatic economic appeals and social services in explaining these parties' popular support. We argue that Islamic party platforms function as informational shortcuts to Muslim voters, and only confer a political advantage when voters are uncertain about parties' economic policies. Using a series of experiments embedded in an original nationwide survey in Indonesia, we find that Islamic parties are systematically more popular than otherwise identical non-Islamic parties only under cases of economic policy uncertainty. When respondents know economic policy platforms, Islamic parties never have an advantage over non-Islamic parties. Our findings demonstrate that Islam's political advantage is real, but critically circumscribed by parties' economic platforms and voters' knowledge of them.