Get access

Holding Mayors Accountable: New York's Executives from Koch to Bloomberg

Authors


  • R. Douglas Arnold is William Church Osborn Professor of Public Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-1013 (arnold@princeton.edu). Nicholas Carnes is Assistant Professor of Public Policy, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0245 (nicholas.carnes@duke.edu).

  • We thank Larry Bartels, Chuck Cameron, Brandice Canes-Wrone, Marty Gilens, Michael Jones-Correa, Ben Lauderdale, Markus Prior, Jeff Tessin, Jessica Trounstine, Greg Wawro, and Phil Wallach for their help and advice and the Woodrow Wilson School for financial support. Replication data are available at http://www.duke.edu/~nwc8/data.html.

Abstract

How do citizens evaluate the performance of their mayors? Previous studies have examined mayoral performance either with cross-sectional surveys or by comparing pairs of consecutive elections. In this article, we use 150 surveys conducted in New York City between 1984 and 2009 to carry out the first time-series analysis of mayoral approval. We show that fluctuations in crime and the economy affect mayors’ ratings and that black and white citizens react similarly to changing local conditions (although their initial evaluations of mayors often diverge sharply). We also show that how New Yorkers rate mayors in the polls is closely related to how they vote for mayors at the polls.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary