SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

• Descriptive Statistics

o Robustness Check #1: Statistical Results from Alternative Estimation Strategies

o Robustness Check #2: Addressing Nonrandom Selection Effects

▪ Probit Selection Model Results Predicting the Presence of Consensus Group Commissions

▪ Outcome Model Results Predicting CG Revenue Forecast Accuracy

Table SA–1. Descriptive Statistics for Variables

Table SA–2. Robustness Checks Analyzing the Relationship between Organizational Structure and the Accuracy of Consensus Group Revenue Forecasts in the American States (FY 1987 – FY 2008): Aggregate Diversity Models

Table SA–3. Robustness Checks Analyzing the Relationship between Organizational Structure and the Accuracy of CG Revenue Forecasts in the American States (FY 1987– FY 2008): Disaggregate Diversity Models

Table SA–4. Statistical Model Analyzing Nonrandom Selection between Consensus Group and Political Branch Revenue Forecasting Institutions in the American States (FY 1987 – FY 2008)

Table SA–5. Robustness Checks Analyzing the Relationship between Organizational Structure and the Accuracy of Consensus Group Revenue Forecasts in the American States (FY 1987 – FY 2008): Aggregate Diversity Models

Table SA–6. Robustness Checks Analyzing the Relationship between Organizational Structure and the Accuracy of CG Revenue Forecasts in the American States (FY 1987– FY 2008): Disaggregate Diversity Models

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
AJPS_614_sm_suppmat.pdf73KSupporting info item

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.