• Please log in or register to access this feature.

What Monet Meant: Intention and Attention in Understanding Art

  1. Mark Rollins

Article first published online: 5 MAY 2004

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00150.x

Issue

The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism

The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism

Volume 62, Issue 2, pages 175–188, Spring 2004

Additional Information

How to Cite

Rollins, M. (2004), What Monet Meant: Intention and Attention in Understanding Art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 62: 175–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00150.x

Author Information

  1. Associate Professor and Chair of Philosophy at Washington University in St. Louis

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 5 MAY 2004
  2. Article first published online: 5 MAY 2004

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (115K)

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Matthew Pelowski, Fuminori Akiba, A model of art perception, evaluation and emotion in transformative aesthetic experience, New Ideas in Psychology, 2011, 29, 2, 80

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Dustin Stokes, Aesthetics and Cognitive Science, Philosophy Compass, 2009, 4, 5
    Direct Link:
  3. 3
    Alessandro Pignocchi, What Is Art? A methodological framework for a pluridisciplinary investigation, Cognitive Semiotics, 2009, 9, 5, 122

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    William Seeley, Aaron Kozbelt, Art, Artists, and Perception: A Model for Premotor Contributions to Perceptual Analysis and Form Recognition, Philosophical Psychology, 2008, 21, 2, 149

    CrossRef

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (115K)