This document reports the results of research and analysis undertaken by the U.S. Census Bureau staff. It has undergone a Census Bureau review more limited in scope than that given to official Census Bureau publications. This document is released to inform interested parties of research and to encourage discussion. This research is a part of the U.S. Census Bureau’s Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program (LEHD), which is partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grants SES-9978093 and SES-0427889 to Cornell University (Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research), the National Institute on Aging Grant R01 AG018854-02, and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The views expressed on statistical issues are those of the author and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau, its program sponsors, or data providers. Some or all of the data used in this paper are confidential data from the LEHD Program. The U.S. Census Bureau supports external researchers’ use of these data through the Research Data Centers (see http://www.ces.census.gov). For other questions regarding the data, please contact Jeremy S. Wu, Program Manager, U.S. Census Bureau, LEHD Program, Room 6H141, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746, USA (Jeremey.S.Wu@census.gov, http://lehd.did.census.gov). The author thanks Hyowook Chiang for providing the data. The author gratefully acknowledges John Haltiwanger, John Shea, Daniel Vincent, Arghya Ghosh, Kevin Fox, Shiko Maruyama, Chris Edmond, Craig Burnside and the two anonymous referees for very helpful comments. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Markets and the non-monotonic relation between productivity and establishment size
Article first published online: 22 FEB 2012
© Canadian Economics Association
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique
Volume 45, Issue 1, pages 345–372, February 2012
How to Cite
Bakhtiari, S. (2012), Markets and the non-monotonic relation between productivity and establishment size. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 45: 345–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01698.x
- Issue published online: 22 FEB 2012
- Article first published online: 22 FEB 2012
Options for accessing this content:
- If you have access to this content through a society membership, please first log in to your society website.
- If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
- Login via other institutional login options http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/login-options.
- You can purchase online access to this Article for a 24-hour period (price varies by title)
- If you already have a Wiley Online Library or Wiley InterScience user account: login above and proceed to purchase the article.
- New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.
Type your institution's name in the box below. If your institution is a Wiley customer, it will appear in the list of suggested institutions and you will be able to log in to access content. Some users may also log in directly via OpenAthens.
Please note that there are currently a number of duplicate entries in the list of institutions. We are actively working on fixing this issue and apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Registered Users please login:
- Access your saved publications, articles and searches
- Manage your email alerts, orders and subscriptions
- Change your contact information, including your password
Please register to:
- Save publications, articles and searches
- Get email alerts
- Get all the benefits mentioned below!