Promoting Participation? An Examination of Rulemaking Notification and Access Procedures

Authors

  • Neal D. Woods

    Corresponding author
    1. University of South Carolina
      Neal D. Woods is an assistant professor of political science at the University of South Carolina. His research focuses on rulemaking and regulation, federalism and intergovernmental relations, and environmental policy.
      E-mail:neal.woods@sc.edu
    Search for more papers by this author

Neal D. Woods is an assistant professor of political science at the University of South Carolina. His research focuses on rulemaking and regulation, federalism and intergovernmental relations, and environmental policy.
E-mail:neal.woods@sc.edu

Abstract

This study documents state implementation of mechanisms designed to promote public participation in agency rulemaking. Many scholars have questioned the effectiveness of such mechanisms, arguing that they fail to encourage greater participation or that increased participation does not affect the substance of administrative rules. Using data from a unique survey of state administrators, the author employs multivariate analyses to assess the relationship between these measures and the perceived influence of external actors. The results suggest that critics may understate the importance of public notification and access procedures. These devices are associated with increases in the impact that a wide variety of actors are perceived to have on the content of agency rules.

Ancillary