SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Breul, Jonathan D. 2007. GPPA—A Foundation for Performance Budgeting. Public Performance and Management Review 30(3): 31231.
  • Carroll, James D. 1995. The Rhetoric of Reform and Political Reality in the National Performance Review. Public Administration Review 55(3): 30212.
  • China Development and Research Foundation (CDRF). 2006. Handbook of Public Budgeting [in Chinese]. Beijing: CDRF.
  • Cope, Glen Hahn. 1995. Budgeting for Performance in Local Government. In The Municipal Yearbook 1995, 4252. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
  • De Lancer Julnes, Patria, and Marc Holzer. 2001. Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation. Public Administration Review 61(6): 693708.
  • Grizzle, Gloria A., and Carole D. Pettijohn. 2002. Implementing Performance-Based Program Budgeting: A System-Dynamics Perspective. Public Administration Review 62(1): 5162.
  • Jordan, Meagan M., and Merl M. Hackbart. 1999. Performance Budgeting and Performance Funding in the States: A Status Assessment. Public Budgeting and Finance 19(1): 6888.
    Direct Link:
  • Joyce, Philip G. 1993. The Reiterative Nature of Budget Reform: Is There Anything New in Federal Budgeting? Public Budgeting and Finance 13(3): 3648.
    Direct Link:
  • Lee, Robert D., and Robert C. Burns. 2000. Performance Measurement in State Budgeting: Advancement and Backsliding from 1990 to 1995. Public Budgeting and Finance 20(1): 3854.
    Direct Link:
  • Melkers, Julia, and Katherine Willoughby. 1998. The State of the States: Performance-Based Budgeting Requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review 58(1): 6673.
  • Newcomer, Kathryn, 2007. How Does Program Performance Assessment Affect Program Management in the Federal Government? Public Performance and Management Review 30(3): 33250.
  • Niu, Meili, Alfred Ho, and Ma Jun. 2006. Performance-Based Budgeting in China: A Case Study of Guangdong. Paper Presented at the Second International Conference on Public Management: 21st Century Opportunities and Challenges, University of Macau, China.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2002. Developing Performance Measures for Public Financial Management. Paris: OECD.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2005a. Challenges for China’s Public Spending: Toward Greater Effectiveness and Equity. Paris: OECD.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2005b. Economic Survey of China 2005. Reforming Public Finances to Better Serve Growth. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/document/31/0,3343,en_2649_34595_35343711_1_1_1_1,00.html. [accessed August 17, 2009].
  • Perrin, Burt. 2003. Implementing the Vision: Addressing Challenges to Results-Focused Management and Budgeting. Paris: OECD.
  • Sung, Yu-Hsieh. 2008. Economy Experience Sharing—Chinese Taipei. Presentation at the APEC Workshop on Government Performance and Results Management Report.
  • U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2001. Results-Oriented Budget Practices in Federal Agencies. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. GAO-01-1084SP.
  • Wang, XiaoHu. 2008. Convincing Legislators with Performance Measures. International Journal of Public Administration 31(6): 65467.
  • Willoughby, Katherine G., and Julia E. Melkers. 2000. Implementing PBB: Conflicting Views of Success. Public Budgeting and Finance 20(1): 10520.
    Direct Link:
  • Willoughby, Katherine G., and Julia E. Melkers. 2005. Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects. Public Administration Review 65(2): 18090.