*Direct correspondence to Stephan J. Goetz, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, 7E Armsby Bldg., The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-5602 〈email@example.com〉. The second-named author 〈firstname.lastname@example.org〉 will share all data and coding information with those wishing to replicate the study. The authors thank three anonymous journal reviewers as well as Mark Henry and other participants at the 2008 Southern Regional Science Association Annual Meeting for their comments and suggestions. This research was funded in part (Grant 20051242) by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City, MO. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the grantee.
Explaining Self-Employment Success and Failure: Wal-Mart Versus Starbucks, or Schumpeter Versus Putnam*
Article first published online: 15 JAN 2009
© 2009 by the Southwestern Social Science Association
Social Science Quarterly
Volume 90, Issue 1, pages 22–38, March 2009
How to Cite
Goetz, S. J. and Shrestha, S. S. (2009), Explaining Self-Employment Success and Failure: Wal-Mart Versus Starbucks, or Schumpeter Versus Putnam. Social Science Quarterly, 90: 22–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00600.x
- Issue published online: 15 JAN 2009
- Article first published online: 15 JAN 2009
Objectives. Two powerful socioeconomic innovations are sweeping the nation, led by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Starbucks Corp. These innovations both affect and are driven by profound labor market changes, but exactly how they affect self-employment or entrepreneurship has not been investigated. We examine the independent effects of these phenomena on the returns to self-employment, which is itself an underresearched topic in labor economics.
Methods. We apply spatial econometric analysis to data from more than 3,000 U.S. counties to analyze how big-boxes and drinking places that facilitate social networking affect self-employment earnings.
Findings. The presence of Wal-Mart stores is associated with higher returns to self-employment, whereas the results for coffee shops and drinking places are mixed. A negative interaction effect on earnings emerges when Wal-Mart stores and drinking places exist in the same county.
Conclusions. We confirm both Schumpeter's and Putnam's assertions about the importance of creative destruction and social networking in raising the productivity of entrepreneurs, although the latter effect is not as clear-cut as the former.