*Direct correspondence to Anthony J. Nownes, Department of Political Science, 1001 McClung Tower, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 〈firstname.lastname@example.org〉. The data and all other materials necessary to replicate this study are available at 〈http://web.utk.edu/~anownes/research.htm〉 or upon request. I thank Nathan J. Kelly for his helpful suggestions and comments.
Density Dependent Dynamics in the Population of Transgender Interest Groups in the United States, 1964–2005*
Article first published online: 15 JUL 2010
© 2010 by the Southwestern Social Science Association
Social Science Quarterly
Volume 91, Issue 3, pages 689–703, September 2010
How to Cite
Nownes, A. J. (2010), Density Dependent Dynamics in the Population of Transgender Interest Groups in the United States, 1964–2005. Social Science Quarterly, 91: 689–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00714.x
- Issue published online: 15 JUL 2010
- Article first published online: 15 JUL 2010
Objective. This article seeks to determine the value of density dependence theory in helping us understand the process of interest group mobilization. The general theory of density dependence has been tested against manifold organizational populations. It has not, however, been tested extensively against data on populations of overtly political organizations.
Methods. I test the theory of density dependence against original data on the foundings of nationally active transgender interest groups in the United States for the period 1964–2005. I estimate several simple Poisson regression count models.
Results. The results provide strong support for the theory of density dependence. Specifically, in the population of U.S. transgender interest groups, the data imply an inverted-U relationship between density and the founding rate.
Conclusions. My findings suggest the following: (1) theories of group mobilization that do not take contextual variables into account are likely to be incomplete; and (2) interest group populations most likely have stable carrying capacities. In all, the results provide yet more support for the general organizational ecology paradigm.