*Direct correspondence to Jonathan Rothwell, The Brookings Institution, 1775 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20036 〈firstname.lastname@example.org〉. This article was first written while Jonathan Rothwell was at Princeton University, and the views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the Brookings Institution. Jonathan Rothwell will share all data and coding information with those wishing to replicate the study. The authors thank Professor Rolf Pendall for generously sharing his data on land regulations, and are grateful to the anonymous Social Science Quarterly reviewers for their helpful suggestions.
Density Zoning and Class Segregation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas*
Version of Record online: 26 OCT 2010
© 2010 by the Southwestern Social Science Association
Social Science Quarterly
Special Issue: Inequality and Poverty: American and International Perspectives
Volume 91, Issue 5, pages 1123–1143, December 2010
How to Cite
Rothwell, J. T. and Massey, D. S. (2010), Density Zoning and Class Segregation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Social Science Quarterly, 91: 1123–1143. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00724.x
- Issue online: 26 OCT 2010
- Version of Record online: 26 OCT 2010
Objectives. Socioeconomic segregation rose substantially in U.S. cities during the final decades of the 20th century, and we argue that zoning regulations are an important cause of this increase.
Methods. We measure neighborhood economic segregation using the Gini coefficient for neighborhood income inequality and the poor-affluent exposure index. These outcomes are regressed on an index of density zoning developed from the work of Pendall for 50 U.S. metropolitan areas, while controlling for other metropolitan characteristics likely to affect urban housing markets and class segregation.
Results. For both 2000 and changes from 1990 to 2000, OLS estimates reveal a strong relationship between density zoning and income segregation, and replication using 2SLS suggests that the relationship is causal. We also show that zoning is associated with higher interjurisdictional inequality.
Conclusions. Metropolitan areas with suburbs that restrict the density of residential construction are more segregated on the basis of income than those with more permissive density zoning regimes. This arrangement perpetuates and exacerbates racial and class inequality in the United States.