*Direct correspondence to Wendy D. Roth, Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, 6303 N.W. Marine Dr., Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z1 〈email@example.com〉. The author is unable to share the data used for this study in order to protect the privacy of the respondents. The author thanks the three anonymous reviewers for extremely helpful comments, as well as Eamonn Callan, Mary Campbell, Jennifer Jihye Chun, Neil Gross, Amy Hanser, Ann Morning, Aliya Saperstein, Mary Waters, and the participants of the Social Statistics and Ethnic Diversity Conference in Montréal. This research was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation (SES-0221042 and IGERT Grant 98070661) and the Harvard University Graduate Society.
Racial Mismatch: The Divergence Between Form and Function in Data for Monitoring Racial Discrimination of Hispanics*
Article first published online: 26 OCT 2010
© 2010 by the Southwestern Social Science Association
Social Science Quarterly
Special Issue: Inequality and Poverty: American and International Perspectives
Volume 91, Issue 5, pages 1288–1311, December 2010
How to Cite
Roth, W. D. (2010), Racial Mismatch: The Divergence Between Form and Function in Data for Monitoring Racial Discrimination of Hispanics. Social Science Quarterly, 91: 1288–1311. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00732.x
- Issue published online: 26 OCT 2010
- Article first published online: 26 OCT 2010
Objectives. A primary justification for collecting U.S. racial statistics is the need to monitor racial discrimination. This article aims to show how analyses of Hispanics—who may officially be of any race—tend to miss discrimination based on racial appearance by relying on data that instead capture racial self-identification, a different aspect of race that often does not correspond.
Methods. The study analyzes 60 qualitative interviews with Dominican and Puerto Rican migrants in the New York metropolitan area. It employs multiple measures to represent theoretically distinct aspects of the lived experience of race.
Results. Respondents interpret the Census race question in different ways corresponding to different aspects of race, which often do not match one another. Although respondents experience discrimination on the basis of phenotype, their racial self-identification is a poor proxy for measuring their racial appearance.
Conclusions. Scholars need to develop a language of race that communicates the multiplicity of social processes involved. Social surveys must provide measures of these multiple components, including interviewer observations of racial appearance, to monitor discrimination on the basis of phenotype within Hispanic groups.