*Direct correspondence to Frederick Solt, Department of Political Science, Mailcode 4501, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901 〈firstname.lastname@example.org〉, who will make available all data and coding needed for replication. The authors thank Stephen Bloom, Mariola Espinosa, Laura Hatcher, Roudy Hildreth, Nathan Kelly, Scott McClurg, Darren Sherkat, and Rachel Whaley for helpful comments.
Economic Inequality, Relative Power, and Religiosity*
Version of Record online: 15 APR 2011
© 2011 by the Southwestern Social Science Association
Social Science Quarterly
Volume 92, Issue 2, pages 447–465, June 2011
How to Cite
Solt, F., Habel, P. and Grant, J. T. (2011), Economic Inequality, Relative Power, and Religiosity. Social Science Quarterly, 92: 447–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00777.x
- Issue online: 2 MAY 2011
- Version of Record online: 15 APR 2011
Objective. What effect does the extent of economic inequality within a country have on the religiosity of the people who live there? As inequality increases, does religion serve primarily as a source of comfort for the deprived and impoverished or as a tool of social control for the rich and powerful?
Methods. This article examines these questions with two complementary analyses of inequality and religiosity: a multilevel analysis of countries around the world over two decades and a time-series analysis of the United States over a half-century.
Results. Economic inequality has a strong positive effect on the religiosity of all members of a society regardless of income.
Conclusions. These results support relative power theory, which maintains that greater inequality yields more religiosity by increasing the degree to which wealthy people are attracted to religion and have the power to shape the attitudes and beliefs of those with fewer means.