The Contact Hypothesis and Attitudes Toward Latinos in the United States

Authors


  • The authors acknowledge the support of the Irma Rangel Public Policy Institute at the University of Texas at Austin.

Direct correspondence (including requests for data and coding for replication purposes) to Christopher G. Ellison, Department of Sociology, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249-0655 〈Christopher.Ellison@utsa.edu〉.

Abstract

Objectives

Although the contact hypothesis occupies an important place in the study of intergroup relations, several important questions remain understudied. We contribute to the literature by examining the associations between multiple aspects of contact with Latinos and several types of attitudes toward U.S. Latinos, including attitudes toward immigration restrictions.

Methods

We use OLS and logistic regression techniques to analyze the opinions of Anglo (non-Hispanic white) and African-American respondents from the 2000 NORCGeneral Social Survey (GSS), which contained a special module on attitudes regarding ethnicity and diversity issues.

Results

Our findings reveal a clear association between close nonkin Latino ties, that is, friendship, and more favorable or empathetic attitudes toward Latinos as well as less restrictive or punitive views concerning immigration policy. Having Latino relatives is also linked with several of these attitudes. Most other dimensions of contact (e.g., attending high schools with significant Latino populations, having Latino acquaintances, Spanish-language fluency, and residing in areas with relatively high Latino populations) have at least some association with the attitudes under study, although for most of these contact measures the significance of the effects is inconsistent across outcomes.

Conclusions

The findings reinforce the significance of intergroup friendships and underscore the importance of understanding their social origins, patterning, and consequences for diverse groups. It is also important to probe the differential effects of specific types and arenas of intergroup contact on specific attitudinal and policy outcomes.

Ancillary