Get access

Do We Choose Our Spouse Based on Our In-Laws? Resolving the Effects of Family Background and Spousal Choice for Educational Attainment, Religious Practice, and Political Preference

Authors


  • For those wishing access to the data or variable coding to replicate the study please email Peter Hatemi. We thank Greg Carey for insightful comments on this article. Data collection was supported by AA-06781 and MH-40828 from the National Institutes of Health. Data analysis was supported by MH-068521 and the United States Studies Centre. Model development was supported by MH-068521.

Direct correspondence to Peter Hatemi, 215 Pond Lab, University Park, PA 16802 〈phatemi@gmail.com〉.

Abstract

Objectives

Contemporary scholarly debate emphasizes the importance of spouse selection on population stratification, typically focusing on the traits of spouses themselves. In this study spouses and their parents were analyzed to resolve the effects of direct spousal assortment from family background assortment on three social traits that spouses correlate the highest: education, church attendance, and political affiliation.

Methods

The data set is comprised of a core of spousal pairs and their parents assessed by self-report and a more extensive set of individuals on whom there are only ratings by relatives for educational attainment, church attendance, and political preference. Structural equation models were fitted to the observed polychoric correlations by diagonal weighted least squares.

Results

For education and church attendance, assortment was based primarily on the traits of the spouses themselves, but models including independent assortment for the traits of parents-in-law gave a better fit. For political affiliation, assortment based on social background influenced by the traits of both parents gave a better fit.

Conclusions

The findings demonstrate that in humans, spousal similarity may reflect processes of selection and stratification that are more complex than commonly supposed in most models for family resemblance and social diversity.

Ancillary