A previous version of this article was presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, March–April 2011. We acknowledge the helpful comments of Andrew Karch, Michelle Swers, Clyde Wilcox, and two anonymous reviewers. We will share all data and coding with those wishing to replicate the study.
Partisanship, Christianity, and Women in the Legislature: Determinants of Parental Leave Policy in U.S. States†
Version of Record online: 3 JUL 2012
© 2012 by the Southwestern Social Science Association
Social Science Quarterly
Volume 94, Issue 4, pages 1084–1101, December 2013
How to Cite
Williamson, S. and Carnes, M. (2013), Partisanship, Christianity, and Women in the Legislature: Determinants of Parental Leave Policy in U.S. States. Social Science Quarterly, 94: 1084–1101. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00882.x
- Issue online: 15 NOV 2013
- Version of Record online: 3 JUL 2012
Although the United States 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act is considered meager by international standards, significant variation in family leave policies exists across U.S. states. This article develops a political theory—driven by mobilized interest groups—to explain variation in the duration and pay level of state parental leave policies.
Employing four different measures of family leave policy, we use ordinary least squares and logit models to test the effects of partisanship, women in the legislature, and evangelical populations on parental leave outcomes.
We find that states with a pattern of Democratic Party controlled legislatures and high percentages of legislative seats occupied by women see more generous parental leave protections, while states with large populations of evangelical Christians see less generous policies.
Family leave policies are the product of a battle between competing visions of the family and the state, shaped by partisanship, gender, and religion.