Pushing “Reset”: The Conditional Effects of Coaching Replacements on College Football Performance

Authors


  • Direct correspondence to E. Scott Adler, Department of Political Science, UCB 333, Boulder, CO 80309-0333 〈E.Scott.Adler@Colorado.EDU〉.

Abstract

Objectives

We assess the effects of coaching replacements on college football team performance.

Methods

Using data from 1997 to 2010, we use matching techniques to compare the performance of football programs that replaced their head coach to those where the coach was retained. The analysis has two major innovations over existing literature. First, we consider how entry conditions moderate the effects of coaching replacements. Second, we examine team performance for several years following the replacement to assess its effects.

Results

We find that for particularly poorly performing teams, coach replacements have little effect on team performance as measured against comparable teams that did not replace their coach. However, for teams with middling records—that is, teams where entry conditions for a new coach appear to be more favorable—replacing the head coach appears to result in worse performance over subsequent years than comparable teams who retained their coach.

Conclusions

The findings have important implications for our understanding of how entry conditions moderate the effects of leadership succession on team performance, and suggest that the relatively common decision to fire head college football coaches for poor team performance may be ill advised.

Ancillary