The author will share all data with those wishing to replicate the study. Van Doorn thanks Angie Bos, Logan Dancey, Corrine McConnaughy, Wendy Rahn, Monica Schneider, and Ismail White for helpful advice.
What is Important? The Impact of Interpersonal Political Discussion on Public Agendas†
Article first published online: 5 DEC 2012
© 2012 by the Southwestern Social Science Association
Social Science Quarterly
Volume 95, Issue 1, pages 132–144, March 2014
How to Cite
van Doorn, B. W. (2014), What is Important? The Impact of Interpersonal Political Discussion on Public Agendas. Social Science Quarterly, 95: 132–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00936.x
- Issue published online: 13 FEB 2014
- Article first published online: 5 DEC 2012
This article investigates the role of discussion networks in agenda-setting. More specifically, the focus is on the question whether the partisan composition of people's discussion networks affects what they judge to be the most important problems facing the country.
Using data from the 2000 American National Election Studies (ANES), I employ logistic regression analysis.
The findings suggest that discussion networks indeed play a significant role in setting the public agenda, even taking into consideration people's media use and several other potentially relevant variables.
While prior research has already linked political discussion to participation and vote choice, this study provides evidence that it also affects what issues people prioritize.