POST-SECULARITY WITHIN CONTEMPORARY CHINESE PHILOSOPHICAL CONTEXTS
Article first published online: 17 MAY 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6253.2011.01679.x
© 2012 Journal of Chinese Philosophy
Additional Information
How to Cite
PFISTER, L. F. (2012), POST-SECULARITY WITHIN CONTEMPORARY CHINESE PHILOSOPHICAL CONTEXTS. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 39: 121–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6253.2011.01679.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 17 MAY 2012
- Article first published online: 17 MAY 2012
Abstract
Based on publications addressing post-secularity in international contexts, this article identifies four basic interpretive positions manifest within our post-secular age: resistant post-secular secularists, strategic post-secular secularists, engaged post-secular intellectuals, and engaged post-secular religious intellectuals. Subsequently, an article addressing governance and religious studies in mainland China published by Zhuo Xinping in 2010 is assessed, indicating how Zhuo serves as an engaged post-secular intellectual position, charging Chinese Marxist officials to adopt a strategic post-secular secularist position. Finally, it is shown how in a major volume on philosophical studies in China published in 2008 by Li Jingyuan a strategic post-secularist position is manifest.

1540-6253/asset/JOCP_centre.gif?v=1&s=3f6fbe1d753051631e4b423d1ca5b5991228004e)
