From the North Carolina State University, University of Pennsylvania, and University of Pittsburgh, respectively. This paper has benefitted from comments from Mustafa Gultekin, Craig MacKinlay, Robert Stambaugh, René Stulz, two anonymous referees, and participants at the Friday lunch microfinance seminar of the Finance Department, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from a faculty research grant at North Carolina State University and a grant from the Geewax-Terker Corporation and the Rodney L. White Center, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly
Article first published online: 30 APR 2012
1992 The American Finance Association
The Journal of Finance
Volume 47, Issue 4, pages 1605–1621, September 1992
How to Cite
AGRAWAL, A., JAFFE, J. F. and MANDELKER, G. N. (1992), The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly. The Journal of Finance, 47: 1605–1621. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04674.x
- Issue published online: 30 APR 2012
- Article first published online: 30 APR 2012
The existing literature on the post-merger performance of acquiring firms is divided. We re-examine this issue, using a nearly exhaustive sample of mergers between NYSE acquirers and NYSE/AMEX targets. We find that stockholders of acquiring firms suffer a statistically significant loss of about 10% over the five-year post-merger period, a result robust to various specifications. Our evidence suggests that neither the firm size effect nor beta estimation problems are the cause of the negative post-merger returns. We examine whether this result is caused by a slow adjustment of the market to the merger event. Our results do not seem consistent with this hypothesis.