Sias is from Washington State University, and Starks is from the University of Texas. We thank Keith Brown, Amar Gande, Mark Griffiths, Jeff Heisler, Ed Maberly, René Stulz, participants at seminars at Indiana University, the University of Missouri, the University of Texas-Dallas, Tulane University, and Washington State University, and an anonymous referee. We thank the NYSE for providing the Torq data and Joel Hasbrouck and George Sofianos for their assistance in interpreting the Torq data. We thank Vera Tonry for research assistance.
Institutions and Individuals at the Turn-of-the-Year
Article first published online: 18 APR 2012
1997 The American Finance Association
The Journal of Finance
Volume 52, Issue 4, pages 1543–1562, September 1997
How to Cite
SIAS, R. W. and STARKS, L. T. (1997), Institutions and Individuals at the Turn-of-the-Year. The Journal of Finance, 52: 1543–1562. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb01120.x
- Issue published online: 18 APR 2012
- Article first published online: 18 APR 2012
This article evaluates the tax-loss-selling hypothesis against the window-dressing hypothesis as explanations for turn-of-the-year anomalies. We examine differences between securities dominated by individual investors versus those dominated by institutional investors and find that the effect is more pervasive in the former. Controlling for capitalization, we find that in early January (late December), stocks with greater individual investor interest outperform (underperform) stocks with greater institutional investor interest. These results hold for both stocks that previously appreciated in value and stocks that previously depreciated in value. The results are most consistent with the tax-loss-selling hypothesis as an explanation for the turn-of-the-year effect.