I benefited greatly from the discussion with Ming Fang on an earlier draft of the paper. I would also like to thank an anonymous referee and associate editor, Buly Cardak, David Prentice, Robert Stambaugh (Editor), and seminar participants at La Trobe University for their valuable comments on the paper.
A Comparison of Centralized and Fragmented Markets with Costly Search
Article first published online: 3 MAY 2005
The Journal of Finance
Volume 60, Issue 3, pages 1567–1590, June 2005
How to Cite
YIN, X. (2005), A Comparison of Centralized and Fragmented Markets with Costly Search. The Journal of Finance, 60: 1567–1590. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00770.x
- Issue published online: 3 MAY 2005
- Article first published online: 3 MAY 2005
How does quotation transparency affect financial market performance? Biais's irrelevance proposition in 1993 shows that centralized markets yield the same expected bid–ask spreads as fragmented markets, other things equal. However, de Frutos and Manzano demonstrated in 2002 that expected spreads in fragmented markets are smaller and market participants prefer to trade in fragmented markets. This paper introduces liquidity traders' costs of searching for a better quote into the Biais model and derives opposite conclusions to these previous studies: expected spreads in centralized markets are smaller and liquidity traders prefer centralized markets, while market makers prefer fragmented markets.