Initial Public Offerings: An Analysis of Theory and Practice
Article first published online: 20 JAN 2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00840.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
BRAU, J. C. and FAWCETT, S. E. (2006), Initial Public Offerings: An Analysis of Theory and Practice. The Journal of Finance, 61: 399–436. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00840.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 20 JAN 2006
- Article first published online: 20 JAN 2006
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
ABSTRACT
We survey 336 chief financial officers (CFOs) to compare practice to theory in the areas of initial public offering (IPO) motivation, timing, underwriter selection, underpricing, signaling, and the decision to remain private. We find the primary motivation for going public is to facilitate acquisitions. CFOs base IPO timing on overall market conditions, are well informed regarding expected underpricing, and feel underpricing compensates investors for taking risk. The most important positive signal is past historical earnings, followed by underwriter certification. CFOs have divergent opinions about the IPO process depending on firm-specific characteristics. Finally, we find the main reason for remaining private is to preserve decision-making control and ownership.

1540-6261/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=f5fa766df21c6468d114bb94916c51480b2eed9e)
1540-6261/asset/jofi_centre.gif?v=1&s=3be479aa919c797606665cb79e364d5eb71c8734)
