Steerable Sheath Catheter Navigation for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Case-Control Study
Article first published online: 9 JUL 2008
©2008, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2008, Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume 31, Issue 7, pages 863–873, July 2008
How to Cite
PIORKOWSKI, C., KOTTKAMP, H., GERDS-LI, J.-H., ARYA, A., SOMMER, P., DAGRES, N., ESATO, M., RIAHI, S., WEISS, S., KIRCHER, S. and HINDRICKS, G. (2008), Steerable Sheath Catheter Navigation for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Case-Control Study. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 31: 863–873. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01101.x
- Issue published online: 9 JUL 2008
- Article first published online: 9 JUL 2008
- Received September 6, 2007; revised December 16, 2007; accepted April 8, 2008.
- atrial fibrillation;
- new technology
Background: Lack of stable access to all desired ablation target sites is one of the limitations for efficacious circumferential left atrial (LA) pulmonary vein (PV) ablation. Targeting that, new catheter navigation technologies have been developed. The aim of this study was to describe atrial fibrillation (AF) mapping and ablation using manually controlled steerable sheath catheter navigation and to compare it against an ablation approach with a nonsteerable sheath.
Methods and Results: In this case-control-analysis 245 consecutive patients (controls) treated with circumferential left atrial PV ablation were matched with 105 subsequently consecutive patients (cases) ablated with a similar line concept but mapping and ablation performed with a manually controlled steerable sheath. One hundred sixty-six patients were selected to be included into 83 matched patient pairs. Ablation success was measured with serial 7-day Holter electrocardiograms. Patients ablated with the steerable sheath showed an increase in the success rate (freedom from AF) from 56% to 77% (P = 0.009) after a single procedure and 6 months of follow-up. With respect to procedural data no difference could be found for procedure time, fluoroscopy time, irradiation dose, and radiofrequency (RF) burning time. With the steerable sheath mean procedural RF power (33 ± 9 vs 41 ± 4 W; P < 0.0005) and total RF energy delivery (97,498 vs 111,864 J; P < 0.005) were significantly lower and the rate of complete PV isolation significantly increased from 10% to 52% (P < 0.0005). The complication rate was the same in both groups. Among different arrhythmia, procedure, and patient characteristics, the lack of early postinterventional arrhythmia recurrences was the only but powerful predictor for long-term ablation success.
Conclusions: An AF mapping and ablation approach solely using a manually controlled steerable sheath for catheter navigation improved the outcome of circumferential left atrial PV ablation at similar intervention times and similar complication rates. The 6-month success rate after a single LA intervention increased from 56% to 77%.