Funding Source: This work was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Medtronic.
Rates of Upgrade of ICD Recipients to CRT in Clinical Practice and the Potential Impact of the More Liberal Use of CRT at Initial Implant
Article first published online: 6 NOV 2011
©2011, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume 35, Issue 1, pages 73–80, January 2012
How to Cite
SCOTT, P. A., WHITTAKER, A., ZEB, M., WATTS, E., YUE, A. M., ROBERTS, P. R. and MORGAN, J. M. (2012), Rates of Upgrade of ICD Recipients to CRT in Clinical Practice and the Potential Impact of the More Liberal Use of CRT at Initial Implant. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 35: 73–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03255.x
Conflicts of interest: PAS and MZ are supported by educational grants from Medtronic. PRR and JMM have received Honoraria and research grants from Medtronic, St Jude, Sorin, and Boston Scientific. AW, EW, and AMY report no conflicts of interest.
- Issue published online: 12 JAN 2012
- Article first published online: 6 NOV 2011
- Received June 9, 2011; revised August 12, 2011; accepted September 5, 2011.
This article has been cited by:
- 1Biventricular pacing for bradycardia: Are we there yet?, Journal of Electrocardiology, 2015, 48, 2, 236,
- 2Review of Eligibility for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, The American Journal of Cardiology, 2015, 116, 2, 318, , , , , , ,
- 3The changing landscape of cardiac pacing, Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie, 2015, 26, 1, 32, ,
- 5Implantable cardioverter defibrillators for the treatment of arrhythmias and cardiac resynchronisation therapy for the treatment of heart failure: systematic review and economic evaluation, Health Technology Assessment, 2014, 18, 56, 1, , , , , , ,