The authors would like to thank Barry Bozeman, Andy Whitford, Monica Gaughan, and Vicky Wilkins for their assistance and guidance on this article.
Investments in Scientific Research: Examining the Funding Threshold Effects on Scientific Collaboration and Variation by Academic Discipline
Article first published online: 28 NOV 2012
© 2012 Policy Studies Organization
Policy Studies Journal
Volume 40, Issue 4, pages 698–729, November 2012
How to Cite
Clark, B. Y. and Llorens, J. J. (2012), Investments in Scientific Research: Examining the Funding Threshold Effects on Scientific Collaboration and Variation by Academic Discipline. Policy Studies Journal, 40: 698–729. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00470.x
- Issue published online: 28 NOV 2012
- Article first published online: 28 NOV 2012
- academic scientific collaboration;
- federal research funding;
- human capital investments
This paper seeks to examine how federal financial support of academic scientists shapes their collaborative behavior. More specifically, it investigates two questions: (i) are there threshold sizes of federal grants that have effects on collaboration? and (ii) do the threshold sizes differ by discipline? To test and model these questions, this paper uses data collected in a 2004–2005 survey by the Research Valuing Mapping Project (a project based at Georgia Tech and led by Barry Bozeman) of 2,086 academically based research scientists and engineers. The analysis in this paper reaffirms the positive relationship between federal funding and collaboration seen in previous works, but the findings suggest that there is in fact a threshold effect—as the positive relationship has a diminishing influence. The findings of this paper are more limited with respect to how academic disciplines’ threshold levels differ. The results indicate a difference in the threshold levels between disciplines for three of the eight models.