Bayesian Robust Inference for Differential Gene Expression in Microarrays with Multiple Samples
Article first published online: 25 JUL 2005
Volume 62, Issue 1, pages 10–18, March 2006
How to Cite
Gottardo, R., Raftery, A. E., Yee Yeung, K. and Bumgarner, R. E. (2006), Bayesian Robust Inference for Differential Gene Expression in Microarrays with Multiple Samples. Biometrics, 62: 10–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00397.x
- Issue published online: 25 JUL 2005
- Article first published online: 25 JUL 2005
- Received July 2004. Revised March 2005. Accepted April 2005.
- Bayesian hierarchical model;
- Bonferroni adjustment;
- cDNA microarrays;
- Empirical Bayes;
- Markov chain Monte Carlo;
- Mixture distribution;
- Singular distribution;
Summary We consider the problem of identifying differentially expressed genes under different conditions using gene expression microarrays. Because of the many steps involved in the experimental process, from hybridization to image analysis, cDNA microarray data often contain outliers. For example, an outlying data value could occur because of scratches or dust on the surface, imperfections in the glass, or imperfections in the array production. We develop a robust Bayesian hierarchical model for testing for differential expression. Errors are modeled explicitly using a t-distribution, which accounts for outliers. The model includes an exchangeable prior for the variances, which allows different variances for the genes but still shrinks extreme empirical variances. Our model can be used for testing for differentially expressed genes among multiple samples, and it can distinguish between the different possible patterns of differential expression when there are three or more samples. Parameter estimation is carried out using a novel version of Markov chain Monte Carlo that is appropriate when the model puts mass on subspaces of the full parameter space. The method is illustrated using two publicly available gene expression data sets. We compare our method to six other baseline and commonly used techniques, namely the t-test, the Bonferroni-adjusted t-test, significance analysis of microarrays (SAM), Efron's empirical Bayes, and EBarrays in both its lognormal–normal and gamma–gamma forms. In an experiment with HIV data, our method performed better than these alternatives, on the basis of between-replicate agreement and disagreement.