• Airasian PW, Miranda H. 2002. The role of assessment in the revised taxonomy. Theory Pract 41(4):24954.
  • Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR (Editors). 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Abridged. New York : Longman.
  • Anderson LW. 2002. Curricular alignment: a re-examination. Theory Pract 41:25560.
  • Anderson LW. 2005. Objectives, evaluation and the improvement of education. Stud Educ Eval 31:10213.
  • Anderson AK. 2006. An assessment of the perception of learning gains of freshmen students in an introductory course in nutrition and food science. J Food Sci Educ 5:1923.
  • Bailin S. 2002. Critical thinking and science education. Sci Educ 11:36175.
  • Baxter GP, Elder AD, Glaser R. 1996. Knowledge-based cognition and performance assessment in the science classroom. Educ Psychol 31:13340.
  • Biggs J. (ND). Aligning teaching for constructive learning. Available from: Accessed Jan 20, 2011.
  • Bransford J, Brown AL, Cocking R. 2000. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington , DC : National Academies Press.
  • Chadwick SM. 2004. Curriculum development in orthodontic specialist registrar training: can orthodontics achieve constructive alignment? J Orthodon 31:26774.
  • Chamberlain VJ, Cummings MN. 2003. Creative instructional methods. New York : Glencoe McGraw-Hill.
  • Crowe A, Dirks C, Wenderoth MP. 2008. Biology in Bloom: implementing Bloom's taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE-Life Sci Educ 7:36881.
  • Dalton E. 2003. The “New Bloom's taxonomy,” objectives and assessments. Available from: Accessed Jan 20, 2011.
  • Huba ME, Freed JE2000Learner-centred  assessment  on  college  campuses:  shifting  the  focus  from  teaching  to  learning.  Boston :  Allyn  and Bacon.
  • IBM SPSS. (2010). IBM SPSS Statistics Version 19. USA : SPSS Inc. an IBM Company.
  • Jideani VA., Jideani IA. (2010). A model for education and promoting food science and technology among high school students and the public. Afr J Biotechnol 9(31):482635.
  • Krathwohl DR. 2002. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract 41:2128.
  • Marzano RJ, Norford JS, Paynter DE, Pickering DJ, Gaddy BB. 2001. Handbook for classroom instruction that works. Alexandria , VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • McMahon T. (2006). Teaching for more effective learning: seven maxims for practice. Readiography 12:3444.
  • Mayer RE. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Pract 41(4):22632.
  • Mayer RE, Wittrock MC. 1996. Problem-solving transfer. In: Berliner DC & Calfee RC, editors. Handbook of educational psychology. New York : Macmillan.
  • Napoleon L, Freedman D, Seetharaman K, Sharma P. 2006. An educational needs assessment of Pennsylvania workforce: opportunities to redefine secondary career and technical education to meet food industry needs. J Food Sci Educ 5:1923.
  • Nusche D. (2008). Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education: a comparative review of selected practices. OECD Education Working Paper No. 15. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Pickard MJ. 2007. The new Bloom's taxonomy: an overview for family and consumer sciences. J Family Cons Sci Educ 25(1):4555.
  • Valsraj KM, Lygo-Baker S. 2006. A balancing act: developing curricula for balanced care within community psychiatry. Advances Psychiatr Treat 12:6979.
  • Whitehead D. 2005. Empirical or tacit knowledge as a basis for theory development? J Clin Nurs 14(2):1434.
  • Zoller, U. 1993. Are lecture and learning compatible? Maybe for LOCS: unlikely for HOCS (SYM). J. Chem Educ 70:1957.