A Review of the Nutrition Claims Made by Proponents of Organic Food
Article first published online: 29 APR 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00108.x
© 2010 Institute of Food Technologists®
Issue

Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
Volume 9, Issue 3, pages 270–277, May 2010
Additional Information
How to Cite
Rosen, J. D. (2010), A Review of the Nutrition Claims Made by Proponents of Organic Food. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 9: 270–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00108.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 29 APR 2010
- Article first published online: 29 APR 2010
- MS 20091037 Submitted 10/18/2009, Accepted 1/4/2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
ABSTRACT: Health-conscious consumers have an interest in knowing if the extra money they spend on organic food is justified. The organic food industry, therefore, has a large financial interest in convincing the public that the food they sell is healthier, tastier, and better for the environment. One area that the industry has concentrated on is the supposed nutritional superiority of their product. The importance of this area to the organic food industry can be seen by the vehemence in which it has attacked and tried to discredit a recent, widely circulated report submitted to the British government that found no scientific evidence for claims that organic food is nutritionally superior to conventional food. Two nongovernment organizations, the Soil Assn. in the United Kingdom and the Organic Center in the United States have been heavily involved in the promotion of organic food. Both of these organizations exert a great deal of influence with the media, and hence with consumers, in both countries. An examination of some of their actions will be included in this article.

1541-4337/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=bbc5c4363a102de9f400f7befb704715c1fa4373)