Nursing Priorities, Actions, and Regrets for Ethical Situations in Clinical Practice
Version of Record online: 18 OCT 2011
© 2011 Sigma Theta Tau International
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Volume 43, Issue 4, pages 385–395, December 2011
How to Cite
Pavlish, C., Brown-Saltzman, K., Hersh, M., Shirk, M. and Rounkle, A.-M. (2011), Nursing Priorities, Actions, and Regrets for Ethical Situations in Clinical Practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 43: 385–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01422.x
- Issue online: 28 NOV 2011
- Version of Record online: 18 OCT 2011
- Accepted August 26, 2011
- Ethical decision making;
- nursing ethics;
- medical futility
Purpose: Nurses in all clinical settings encounter ethical issues that frequently lead to moral distress. This critical incident study explored nurses' descriptions of ethically difficult situations to identify priorities, action responses, and regrets.
Methods: Employing the critical incident technique, researchers developed a questionnaire that collected information on ethically difficult situations, nurse actions, and situational outcomes. Data on nursing priorities and actions were analyzed and categorized using a constant comparison technique.
Findings: Addressing patient autonomy and quality of life were ethical priorities in the majority of cases. In many cases, nurses analyzed ethics from a diffuse perspective and only considered one dimension of the ethics conflict. However, some nurses were specific in their ethical analysis and proactive in their action choices. Nurses also identified 12 ethics-specific nurse activities, five ways of being, three ways of knowing, and two ways of deliberating. In 21 cases, nurses chose not to pursue their concerns beyond providing standard care. Several nurses expressed significant regret in their narration; most regretted unnecessary pain and suffering, and some claimed they did not do enough for the patient.
Conclusions: Not enough specific, evidence-based ethics actions have been developed. Stronger and more proactive nursing voices with early ethics interventions would make valuable contributions to quality of care for patients, especially at the end of life.
Clinical Relevance: Ever-expanding treatment options raise ethical issues and challenge nurses to be effective patient advocates. Evidence-based nursing interventions that promptly identify and address moral conflict will benefit patients, their families, and the entire healthcare team by mitigating potential moral distress and disengagement.