We are grateful for the participation of the survey respondents, and assistance from Jan Perez. We also express appreciation to three anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions. Funding for this project was provided by the USDA as part of “A consortium-based program for sustainable agriculture along the Central Coast of California.”
Beyond Organic and Fair Trade? An Analysis of Ecolabel Preferences in the United States
Article first published online: 1 FEB 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00009.x
Copyright © 2010, by the Rural Sociological Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Howard, P. H. and Allen, P. (2010), Beyond Organic and Fair Trade? An Analysis of Ecolabel Preferences in the United States. Rural Sociology, 75: 244–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00009.x
- †
We are grateful for the participation of the survey respondents, and assistance from Jan Perez. We also express appreciation to three anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions. Funding for this project was provided by the USDA as part of “A consortium-based program for sustainable agriculture along the Central Coast of California.”
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 JUN 2010
- Article first published online: 1 FEB 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Cited in:
- CrossRef
This article has been cited by:
- 1, , Can we find solutions with people? Participatory action research with small organic producers in Andalusia, Journal of Rural Studies, 2011, 27, 4, 372
- 2, , Data and monitoring needs for a more ecological agriculture, Environmental Research Letters, 2011, 6, 1, 014017
- 3, , Does Local Labeling Complement or Compete with Other Sustainable Labels? A Conjoint Analysis of Direct and Joint Values for Fresh Produce Claim, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2011, 93, 3, 693
- 4, , Public Concern with Farm-Animal Welfare: Religion, Politics, and Human Disadvantage in the Food Sector, Rural Sociology, 2011, 76, 2Direct Link:
- 5, New Ways of Working and Organization: Alternative Agrifood Movements and Agrifood Researchers, Rural Sociology, 2010, 75, 4Direct Link:

1549-0831/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=b9cef13b789062b36fcd09b2c6c5bb72b47845bc)
1549-0831/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=8a4171800f0cd0cbd730ae31b5a864fe15fcae52)
