The Relationship of Body Fatness and Body Fat Distribution with Microvascular Recruitment: The Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study
Article first published online: 27 MAR 2012
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Volume 19, Issue 3, pages 273–279, April 2012
How to Cite
WIJNSTOK, N., HOEKSTRA, T., ERINGA, E., SMULDERS, Y., TWISK, J. and SERNE, E. (2012), The Relationship of Body Fatness and Body Fat Distribution with Microvascular Recruitment: The Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study. Microcirculation, 19: 273–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2011.00157.x
- Issue published online: 27 MAR 2012
- Article first published online: 27 MAR 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 28 DEC 2011 03:41PM EST
- Received 29 July 2011; accepted 21 December 2011.
- body fat distribution;
- microvascular recruitment;
Please cite this paper as: Wijnstok N, Hoekstra T, Eringa E, Smulders Y, Twisk J, Serne E. The relationship of body fatness and body fat distribution with microvascular recruitment: The Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study. Microcirculation 19: 273–279, 2012.
Introduction: Microvascular function has been proposed to link body fatness to CVD and DM2. Current knowledge of these relationships is mainly based on studies in selected populations of extreme phenotypes. Whether these findings can be translated to the general population remains to be investigated.
Aim: To assess the relationship of body fatness and body fat distribution with microvascular function in a healthy population-based cohort.
Methods: Body fatness parameters were obtained by anthropometry and whole-body dual-X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in 2000 and 2006. Microvascular recruitment (i.e., absolute increase in perfused capillaries after arterial occlusion, using nailfold capillaroscopy) was measured in 2006. Linear regression analysis was used to examine the relationship of (changes in) body fatness and body fat distribution with microvascular recruitment.
Results: Data were available for 259 participants (116 men). Capillary density was higher in women than in men (difference 7.3/ mm2; p < 0.05). In the total population, the relationship between total body fatness and microvascular recruitment was positive (β = 0.43; p = 0.002), whereas a central pattern of fat distribution (trunk-over-total fatness) showed a negative relationship (β = −26.2; p = 0.032) with microvascular recruitment. However, no association remained apparent after adjustment for gender. In addition, there was no relationship between 6-year changes in body fatness or fat distribution and microvascular recruitment.
Conclusion: Women show higher capillary recruitment values than men. This study does not support a linear relationship between microvascular function and body fatness or body fat distribution within a population-based normal range.