SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adger, D. (2003). Core syntax. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Alexander, R. M. (2003). Principles of animal locomotion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Ancel, L. (1999). A quantitative model of the Simpson-Baldwin effect. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 196, 197209.
  • Anderson, M. B. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Baker, C. L., & McCarthy, J. J. (Eds.) (1981). The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Baldwin, J. M. (1896). A new factor in evolution. American Naturalist, 30, 441451.
  • Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (Eds.) (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Barlow, H. B. (1983). Intelligence, guesswork, language. Nature, 304, 207209.
  • Batali, J. (1998). Computational simulations of the emergence of grammar. In J. R.Hurford, M.Studdert Kennedy, & C.Knight (Eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language: Social and cognitive bases (pp. 405426). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1979). A functionalist approach to the acquisition of grammar. In E.Ochs & B.Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 167209). New York: Academic Press.
  • Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B.MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bekoff, M. & Byers, J. A. (Eds.) (1998). Animal play: Evolutionary, comparative, and ecological perspectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In R.Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and language development (pp. 277360). New York: Wiley & Sons.
  • Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bio-program hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 173212.
  • Bickerton, D. (1995). Language and human behavior. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
  • Boeckx, C. (2006). Linguistic minimalism: Origins, concepts, methods, and aims. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • De Boer, B. (2000). Self-organization in vowel systems. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 441465.
  • Botha, R. P. (1999). On Chomsky’s “fable” of instantaneous language evolution. Language and Communication, 19, 243257.
  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Brighton, H., Smith, K., & Kirby, S. (2005). Language as an evolutionary system. Physics of Life Reviews, 2, 177226.
  • Byrne, R. W., & Byrne, J. M. E. (1993). Complex leaf-gathering skills of mountain gorillas (Gorilla g. berengei): Variability and standardization. American Journal of Primatology, 31, 241261.
  • Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1996). Science and core knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 63, 515533.
  • Carroll, S. B. (2001). Chance and necessity: The evolution of morphological complexity and diversity. Nature, 409, 11021109.
  • Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chater, N., Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2009). Restrictions on biological adaptation in language evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10151020.
  • Chater, N., & Vitányi, P. (2007). “Ideal learning” of natural language: Positive results about learning from positive evidence. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 51, 135163.
  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris Publications.
  • Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
  • Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 122.
  • Christiansen, M. H. (1994). Infinite languages, finite minds: Connectionism, learning and linguistic structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.
  • Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489558.
  • Christiansen, M. H., Chater, N., & Reali, F. (in press). The biological and cultural foundations of language. Communicative and Integrative Biology.
  • Clark, H. H. (1975). Bridging. In R. C.Schank & B. L.Nash-Webber (Eds.), Theoretical issues in natural language processing (pp. 169174). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 139.
  • Comrie, B. (1989). Language typology and language change. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2001). Sequential learning in non-human primates. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 539546.
  • Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 597650.
  • Crain, S., Goro, T., & Thornton, R. (2006). Language acquisition is language change. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 3149.
  • Crain, S., & Lillo-Martin, D. C. (1999). An introduction to linguistic theory and language acquisition. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Crain, S., & Pietroski, P. (2001). Nature, nurture and universal grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24, 139186.
  • Crain, S., & Pietroski, P. (2006). Is generative grammar deceptively simple or simply deceptive? Lingua, 116, 6468.
  • Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Crowley, J., & Katz, L. (1999). Development of ocular dominance columns in the absence of retinal input. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 11251130.
  • Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Culicover, P. W., & Nowak, A. (2003). Dynamical grammar. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Dediu, D., & Ladd, D. R. (2007). Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, Microcephalin and ASPM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 1094410949.
  • Dienes, Z., & McLeod, P. (1993). How to catch a cricket ball. Perception, 22, 14271439.
  • Dyer, F. C. (2002). The biology of the dance language. Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 917949.
  • Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Evans, N., & Levinson, S. (2008). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
  • Evans, J., & Saffran, J. R. (2005). Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Boston, MA: Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development.
  • Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2006). Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 1220312208.
  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137140.
  • Feldman, J. (1997). The structure of perceptual categories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 145170.
  • Field, D. J. (1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response profiles of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 4, 23792394.
  • Fitneva, S. A., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (in press). From sound to syntax: Phonological constraints on children’s lexical categorization of new words. Journal of Child Language.
  • Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Galef, B. G., & Laland, K. N. (2005). Social learning in animals: Empirical studies and theoretical models. Bioscience, 55, 489499.
  • Garcia, J., Kimeldorf, D. J., & Koelling, R. A.. (1955). Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. Science, 122, 157158.
  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
  • Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Goldberg, A. E. (2008). Universal Grammar? Or prerequisites for natural language? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 522523.
  • Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bloom, L., Smith, L., Woodward, A., Akhtar, N., Tomasello, M., & Hollich, G. (Eds.) (2000). Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. A. (2000). Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 178186.
  • Gopnik, M., & Crago, M. B. (1991). Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder. Cognition, 39, 150.
  • Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999). The scientist in the crib: What early learning tells us about the mind. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Gould, S. J. (1993). Eight little piggies: Reflections in natural history. New York: Norton.
  • Gray, R. D., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2003). Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature, 426, 435439.
  • Griffiths, T. L., & Kalish, M. L. (2005). A Bayesian view of language evolution by iterated learning. In B. G.Bara, L. W.Barsalou, & M.Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 827832). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hare, M., & Elman, J. L. (1995). Learning and morphological change. Cognition, 56, 6198.
  • Harman, G., & Kulkarni, S. (2007). Reliable reasoning: Induction and statistical learning theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hauser, M. D. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. New York: Ecco/HarperCollins.
  • Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 15691579.
  • Hauser, M. D., & Fitch, W. T. (2003). What are the uniquely human components of the language faculty? In M. H.Christiansen & S.Kirby (Eds.), Language evolution (pp. 158181). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hawkins, J. A. (2004). Complexity and efficiency in grammars. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Healy, S. D., & Hurly, T. A. (2004). Spatial learning and memory in birds. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 63, 211220.
  • Healy, S. D., Walsh, P., & Hansell, M. (2008). Nest building in birds. Current Biology, 18, R271R273.
  • Holmes, W. G., & Sherman, P. W. (1982). The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. American Zoologist, 22, 491517.
  • Hopper, P., & Traugott, E. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hornstein, N., & Lightfoot, D. (Eds.) (1981). Explanations in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition. London: Longman.
  • Hsu, H.-J., Christiansen, M. H., Tomblin, J. B., Zhang, X., & Gómez, R. L. (2006). Statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in adolescents with and without language impairment. Madison, WI: Poster presented at the 2006 Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders.
  • Hudson Kam, C. L., & Newport, E. L. (2005). Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development, 1, 151195.
  • Hurley, S., & Chater, N. (Eds.) (2005). Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science. Volume 1. Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Jackendoff, R. (2000). Foundations of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Jenkins, L. (2000). Biolinguistics: Exploring the biology of language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Inhelder, B. (1973). If you want to get ahead get a theory. Cognition, 3, 195212.
  • Kirby, S. (1999). Function, selection and innateness: The emergence of language universals. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Kirby, S. (2007). The evolution of meaning-space structure through iterated learning. In C.Lyon, C.Nehaniv, & A.Cangelosi (Eds.), Emergence of communication and language (pp. 253268). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
  • Kirby, S., Dowman, M., & Griffiths, T. (2007). Innateness and culture in the evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 52415245.
  • Kirby, S., & Hurford, J. R. (2002). The emergence of linguistic structure: An overview of the iterated learning model. In A.Cangelosi & D.Parisi (Eds.), Simulating the evolution of language (pp. 121148). London: Springer Verlag.
  • Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2001). The poverty of the stimulus argument. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52, 217276.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1987). Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics, 23, 379434.
  • Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Li, M., & Vitányi, P. (1997). An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity theory and its applications (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
  • Lieberman, P. (1984). The biology and evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lightfoot, D. (2000). The spandrels of the linguistic genotype. In C.Knight, M.Studdert-Kennedy, & J. R.Hurford (Eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form (pp. 231247). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676703.
  • Marler, P. & Slabbekoorn, H. (Eds.) (2004). Nature’s music: The science of birdsong. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
  • Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Laland, K. (2006). Toward a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 329383.
  • Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2008). Integration of multiple probabilistic cues in syntax acquisition. In H.Behrens (Ed.), Trends in corpus research: Finding structure in data (TILAR Series) (pp. 139163). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Morgan, J. L., & Demuth, K. (1996). Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Müller, R.-A. (2009). Language universals in the brain: How linguistic are they? In M. H.Christiansen, C.Collins, & S.Edelman (Eds.), Language universals (pp. 224252). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nadig, A. S., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children’s on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13, 329336.
    Direct Link:
  • Nettle, D. (1999). Linguistic diversity. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Niyogi, P. (2006). The computational nature of language learning and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Nowak, M. A., Komarova, N. L., & Niyogi, P. (2001). Evolution of universal grammar. Science, 291, 114118.
  • O’Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Oller, D. K. (2000). The emergence of the speech capacity. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Olson, K. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2008). Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition, 108, 222231.
  • Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2005). The self-organization of speech sounds. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 233, 435449.
  • Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1989). Evolution, selection and cognition: From “learning” to parameter setting in biology and in the study of language. Cognition, 31, 144.
  • Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169225.
  • Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow and Company.
  • Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 13, 707727.
  • Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition, 95, 201236.
  • Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2009). The components of language: What’s specific to language, and what’s specific to humans? In M. H.Christiansen, C.Collins, & S.Edelman (Eds.), Language universals (pp. 126151). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Pomerantz, J. R., & Kubovy, M. (1986). Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization: Simplicity and likelihood principles. In K. R.Boff, L.Kaufman & J. P.Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance volume 2: Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 36–136-46). New York: Wiley.
  • Pullum, G. K., & Scholz, B. (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. Linguistic Review, 19, 950.
  • Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: Structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cognitive Science, 29, 10071028.
  • Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Reuland, E. (2008). Why neo-adaptationism fails. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 531532.
  • Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Roberts, M., Onnis, L., & Chater, N. (2005). Language Acquisition and Language Evolution: Two puzzles for the price of one. In M.Tallerman (Ed.), Prerequisites for the evolution of language (pp. 334356). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Roth, F. P. (1984). Accelerating language learning in young children. Child Language, 11, 89107.
  • De Ruiter, J. P., & Levinson, S. C. (2008). A biological infrastructure for communication underlies the cultural evolution of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 518.
  • Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110114.
    Direct Link:
  • Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Aronoff, M. (2005). The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 26612665.
  • Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Searcy, W. A., & Nowicki, S. (2001). The evolution of animal communication: Realiability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. (2001). Constraint-satisfaction in language acquisition. In M. H.Christiansen & N.Chater (Eds.), Connectionist psycholinguistics (pp. 281318). Westport, CT: Ablex.
  • Senghas, A., Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2004). Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science, 305, 17791782.
  • Shadmehr, R., & Wise, S. P. (2005). The computational neurobiology of reaching and pointing: A foundation for motor learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. A.Ferguson & D. I.Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175208). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 238299.
  • Stephens, D. W., Brown, J. S., & Ydenberg, R. C. (2007). Foraging: Behavior and ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 299351.
  • Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J.Miller & P.Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and perception (pp. 217262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Tenenbaum, J. B. (1999). Bayesian modeling of human concept learning. In M.Kearns, S.Solla, & D.Cohn (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 11 (pp. 5965). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., & Shafto, P. (2007). Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive reasoning. In A.Feeney & E.Heit (Eds.), Inductive reasoning (pp. 114136). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tomasello, M. (2000). Do you children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74, 209253.
  • Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675691.
  • Tomblin, J. B., Mainela-Arnold, E., & Zhang, X. (2007). Procedural learning in adolescents with and without specific language impairment. Language Learning and Development, 3, 269293.
  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 3557.
  • Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergartenpath effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89134.
  • Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ullman, M. T., & Pierpont, E. I. (2005). Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex, 41, 399433.
  • Van der Lely, H. K. J., & Battell, J. (2003). WH-movement in children with grammatical SLI: A test of the RDDR hypothesis. Language, 79, 153181.
  • Wang, D., & Li, H. (2007). Nonverbal language in cross-cultural communication. Sino-US English Teaching, 4, 6670.
  • Weber, B. H. & Depew, D. J. (Eds.) (2003). Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Weissenborn, J. & Höhle, B. (Eds.) (2001). Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Wexler, K. (2004). Lennenberg’s dream. In L.Jenkins (Ed.), Variation and universals in biolinguistics (pp. 239284). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Wilson, E. O. (1971). The insect societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wynne, T., & Coolidge, F. L. (2008). A stone-age meeting of minds. American Scientist, 96, 4451.
  • Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least-effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Zuidema, W. (2003). How the poverty of the stimulus solves the poverty of the stimulus. In S.Becker, S.Thrun, & K.Obermayer (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 15 (pp. 5158). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.