SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abramson, N. (1963). Information theory and coding. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Altmann, G. T. M., & Mirković, J. (2009). Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33, 127.
  • Altmann, G. T. M., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191238.
  • Amundson, J. C., & Miller, R. R. (2008). CS–US temporal relations in blocking. Learning and Behavior, 36(2), 92103.
  • Anderson, S. R., & Lightfoot, D. W. (2002). The language organ: Linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Arnon, I., & Ramscar, M. (2008). How order-of-acquisition shapes language learning: The case of grammatical gender. Paper presented to the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
  • Arnon, I., & Ramscar, M. (2009). Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: How order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam.
  • Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2004). The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 47(1), 3156.
  • Baayen, R. H., & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F. (2005). Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language, 81, 666698.
  • Bannard, C., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Modeling children’s early grammatical knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106(41), 1728417289.
  • Bannard, C., & Matthews, D. E. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 19, 241248.
    Direct Link:
  • Barlow, H. (2001). Redundancy reduction revisited. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 12, 241253.
  • Bell, A., Brenier, J., Gregory, M., Girand, C., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 92111.
  • Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150177.
  • Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bod, R. (2009). From exemplar to grammer: A probailistic analogy-based model of language learning. Cognitive Science, 33(5) , 752793.
  • Bod, R., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S. (Eds.) (2003). Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Borensztajn, G., Zuidema, W., & Bod, R. (2009). Children’s grammars grow more abstract with age—Evidence from an automatic procedure for identifying the productive units of language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 175188.
  • Bornstein, M. H. (1985). On the development of color naming in young children: Data and theory. Brain and Language, 26, 7293.
  • Bornstein, M. H., Kessen, W., & Weiskopf, S. (1976). Color vision and hue categorization in young human infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 115119.
  • Bresnan, J. (2007). Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In S.Featherston, & W.Sternefeld (Eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base generative grammar (pp. 7796). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Bybee, J. (2002). Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 215222.
  • Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 529551.
  • Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (Eds.) (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Typological studies in language, Vol. 45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Charniak, E., & Genzel, D. (2002) Entropy rate constancy in text. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL02) (pp. 199206). Somerset, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Chen, S. F., & Goodman, J. T. (1996). An empirical study of smoothing techniques for language modeling. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL96) (pp. 310318). Somerset, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Chen, S. F., & Goodman, J. T. (1998). An empirical study of smoothing techniques for language modeling. Technical Report TR-10-98, Computer Science Group. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104(2), 367405.
  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
  • Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of verbal behavior, by B.F. Skinner. Language, 35, 2657.
  • Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clark, E. V. (2003). First language acquition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clark, E. V. (2009). First language acquisition (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 139.
  • Cover, T. M., & King, R. C. (1978). A convergent gambling estimate of the entropy of English. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 24(4), 413421.
  • Darwin, C. (1877). Biographiche skizze eines kleinen kindes. Kosmos, 367376.
  • Davidson, D. (1986). A nice derangement of epitaphs. In E.LePore (Ed.), Truth and interpretation: Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 433436). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Deak, G. O., & Holt, A. (2008). Language learning. In H. L.Roediger, III (Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference, volume 2: Cognitive psychology of memory (pp. 557578). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
  • DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 11171121.
  • Derks, P. L., & Paclisanu, M. I. (1967). Simple strategies in binary prediction by children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(2), 278285.
  • Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179211.
  • Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fodor, J. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Fodor, J. (2000). The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fodor, J., & Pylyshyn, F. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture. Cognition, 28(1-2), 371.
  • Gallistel, C. R.. (2001). Mental representations. Encyclopedia of the behavioral and social sciences. New York: Elsevier.
  • Gallistel, C. R. (2003). Conditioning from an information processing perspective. Behavioural Processes, 62, 89101.
  • Gallistel, C. R., & Gibbon, J. (2000). Time, rate and conditioning. Psychological Review, 107, 344389.
  • Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment and dialogue. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 292304.
  • Gennari, S. P., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses. Cognition, 111, 123.
  • Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. A.Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development: Vol. 2. Language, thought, and culture (pp. 301334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155170.
  • Gentner, D. (2003). Why we’re so smart. In D.Gentner, & S.Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and cognition (pp. 195236). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gentner, D. (2006). Why verbs are hard to learn. In K.Hirsh-Pasek, & R.Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 544564). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988a). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(3), 227247.
  • Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988b). Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 166195.
  • Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in Language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Goldberg, A. E., & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language, 80, 532568.
  • Goldberg, A. E., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The end result(ative). Language, 81(2), 474477.
  • Goldstein, M. H., & Schwade, J. A. (2008). Social feedback to infants’ babbling facilitates rapid phonological learning. Psychological Science, 19, 515522.
    Direct Link:
  • Goldstone, R. L., Medin, D. L., & Gentner, D. (1991). Relational similarity and the non-independence of features in similarity judgments. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 222264.
  • Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2005). Similarity. In K. J.Holyoak, & R.Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 1336). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goodman, N. (1972). Problems and projects. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merril.
  • Goodman, J. T. (2001). A bit of progress in language modeling. Computer Speech and Language, 15(4), 403434.
  • Hagoort, P., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2007). Beyond the sentence given. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Series B: Biological Sciences, 362, 801811.
  • Hahn, U., & Ramscar, M. (2001). Similarity and categorization. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Hale, J. (2003). The information conveyed by words in sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(2), 101123.
  • Hart, B., & Risley, T.. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial intelligence: The very idea, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hollerman, J. R., & Schultz, W. (1998). Dopamine neurons report an error in the temporal prediction of reward during learning. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 304309.
  • Hudson Kam, C. L., & Newport, E. L. (2005). Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development, 1, 151195.
  • Hudson Kam, C. L., & Newport, E. L. (2009). Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology, 59(1), 3066.
  • Hume, D. (1740). A treatise of human nature (1967 ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Huttenlocher, P. R., & Dabholkar, A. S. (1997). Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 387(2), 167178.
  • Jackendoff, R. S. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K.Johnson, & J.Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145165). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 6099.
  • Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H.. (2009). Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, speech recognition, and computational linguistics (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B.Campbell, & R.Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behaviour (pp. 279296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Kolmogorov, A. N. (1965). Three approaches to the definition of the quantity of information. Problems of Information Transmission, 1, 311.
  • Kuhl, P. K. (1994). Learning and representation in speech and language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 812822.
  • Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 97(22), 1185011857.
  • Kurtz, K. J., Gentner, D., & Gunn, V. (1999). Reasoning. In D. E.Rumelhart & B. M.Bly (Eds.), Cognitive science: Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 145200). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Event-related brain potential (ERP) studies of sentence processing. In G.Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 385406). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 11261177.
  • Love, B. C., Medin, D. L., & Gureckis, T. M. (2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111, 309338.
  • Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
  • Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Markman, A. B. (1996). Structural alignment in similarity and difference judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3(2), 227230.
  • Markman, A. B. (1999). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Markman, A. B., & Ross, B. H. (2003). Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 592613.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1975). Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science, 189, 226228.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71102.
  • McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 186.
  • McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211246.
  • Milin, P., Kuperman, V., Kostic, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Paradigms bit by bit: An information theoretic approach to the processing of paradigmatic structure in inflection and derivation. In J. P.Blevins & J.Blevins (Eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition (pp. 214252). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 8197.
  • Miller, R. R., Barnet, R. C., & Grahame, N. J. (1995). Assessment of the Rescorla–Wagner model. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 363386.
  • Miller, G. A., & Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In R. D.Luce, R. R.Bush, & E.Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. II, pp. 419491). New York: John Wiley.
  • Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Nakatani, K., & Gibson, E. (2008). Distinguishing theories of syntactic expectation cost in sentence comprehension: Evidence from Japanese. Linguistics, 46(1), 6386.
  • Nakatani, K., & Gibson, E. (in press). An on-line study of Japanese nesting complexity. Cognitive Science .
  • Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115(2), 357395.
  • Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1995). Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(5), 12091228.
  • Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 204238.
  • Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1997). The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 34(3), 191243.
  • O’Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2001). Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 108, 311345.
  • Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2007). What makes a discourse constraining? Comparing the effects of discourse message and scenario fit on the discourse-dependent N400 effect. Brain Research, 1153, 166177.
  • Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2008). Discourse-based word anticipation during language processing: Prediction of priming? Discourse Processes, 45, 464496.
  • Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model of stimulus generalization for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 6173.
  • Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587607.
  • Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532552.
  • Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008). Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral & Brain Science, 31, 109178.
  • Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 105110.
  • Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In J.Bybee & P.Hopper (Eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of lexical structure (pp. 137157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Pierrehumbert, J. (2003). Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In R.Bod, J.Hay, & S.Jannedy (Eds.), Probability theory in linguistics (pp. 177228). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Plag, I., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language, 85, 106149.
  • Pollard, C., & Sag, I. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
  • Quine, W. V. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rakic, P., Bourgeois, J. P., Eckenhoff, M. F., Zecevic, N., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1986). Concurrent overproduction of synapses in diverse regions of the primate cerebral cortex. Science, 232(4747), 232235.
  • Ramscar, M., & Dye, M. (2009a). Expectation and negative evidence in language learning: The curious absence of mouses in adult speech. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam.
  • Ramscar, M., & Dye, M. (2009b). No representation without taxation: The costs and benefits of learning to conceptualize the environment. Proceedings of the Analogy 09 Conference, Sofia, Bulgaria.
  • Ramscar, M., Dye, M., Witten, J., & Klein, J. (2009). Two routes to cognitive flexibility: Learning and response conflict resolution in the Dimensional Change Card Sort Task. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam.
  • Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & Yarlett, D. (2009). No representation without taxation: The costs and benefits of learning to conceptualize the environment. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam.
  • Ramscar, M., & Gitcho, N. (2007). Developmental change and the nature of learning in childhood. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(7), 274279.
  • Ramscar, M., Matlock, T., & Dye, M. (in press). Running down the clock: The role of expectation in our understanding of time and motion. Language and Cognitive Processes.
  • Ramscar, M., & Yarlett, D. (2007). Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 31, 927960.
  • Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It’s not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43(3), 151160.
  • Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H.Black & W. F.Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 6499). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Rice, N. (1980). Cognition to language. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
  • Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., Davies, I. R. L., & Shapiro, L. R. (2004). The development of color categories in two languages: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 554571.
  • Rodemich, E. R. (1970). Covering by rook-domains. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, 9, 117128.
  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E.Rosch, & B. B.Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 2748). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
  • Rosenblatt, F.. (1959). Two theorems of statistical separability in the Perceptron. In V. Blake & A. M., Uttley (Eds.), Mechanisation of thought processes: Proceedings of a symposium held at the National Physical Laboratory (pp. 419456). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
  • Rudy, J. W. (1974). Stimulus selection in animal conditioning and paired-associate learning: Variations in the associative process. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 13, 282296.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & McClelland, J. L.. (1986). A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In D. E., Rumelhart, & J. L., McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microarchitecture of cognition (Vol. I, pp. 4455). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning past tenses of English verbs. In D. E.Rumelhart, & J. L.McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Vol 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 216271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., & Zipser, D.. (1986) Feature discovery by competitive learning. In D. E.Rumelhart, & J. L.McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations (pp. 51193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Saffran, J. R. (2001). The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 493515.
  • Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 19261928.
  • Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70, 2752.
  • Sandhofer, C., & Smith, L. B. (1999). Learning color words involves learning a system of mappings. Developmental Psychology, 35, 668679.
  • Sandhofer, C., & Smith, L. B. (2001). Why children learn color and size words so differently: Evidence from adults’ learning of artificial terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 600620.
  • Savage-Rumbaugh, S., & Lewin, R. (1994). Kanzi: The ape at the brink of the human mind. Toronto: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379423.
  • Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 13171323.
  • Shimamura, A. P. (2000). The role of prefrontal cortex in dynamic filtering. Psychobiology, 28, 207218.
  • Siegel, S., & Allan, L. G. (1996). The widespread influence of the Rescorla–Wagner model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 314321.
  • Singleton, J. L., & Newport, E. L. (2004). When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American sign language from inconsistent input. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 370407.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.
  • St. Clair, M., Monaghan, P., & Ramscar, M. (2009). Relationships between language structure and language learning: The suffixing preference and grammatical categorization. Cognitive Science, 33(7), 13171329.
  • Tanenhaus, M. K., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2008). Language processing in the natural world. In B. C. M.Moore, L. K.Tyler, & W. D.Marslen-Wilson (Eds.), The perception of speech: From sound to meaning. Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 11051122.
  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. E. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 16321634.
  • Thompson-Schill, S. L., Ramscar, M., & Chrysikou, M. (2009). Cognition without control: When a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8(5), 259263.
    Direct Link:
  • Thorpe, K., & Fernald, A. (2006). Knowing what a novel word is not: Two-year-olds “listen through” ambiguous adjectives in fluent speech. Cognition, 100, 389433.
  • Tily, H., Gahl, S., Arnon, I., Snider, N., Kothari, A., & Bresnan, J. (2009). Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation in spontaneous speech. Language and Cognition, 1(2), 147165.
  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Trueswell, J. C., & Gleitman, L. R. (2007). Learning to parse and its implications for language acquisition. In G.Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 635657). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Trueswell, J. C., Papafragou, A., & Choi, Y. (in press). Syntactic and referential processes: What develops? In E. Gibson & N. Pearlmutter (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Van Son, R., & Pols, L. (2003). How efficient is speech? Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, 25, 171184.
  • Waelti, P., Dickinson, A., & Schultz, W. (2001). Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory. Nature, 412, 4348.
  • Wasserman, E. A., Elek, S. M., Chatlosh, D. L., & Baker, A. G. (1993). Rating causal relations: The role of probability in judgments of response-outcome contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 174188.
  • Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(6), 18661878.
  • Williams, J. J., & Lombrozo, T.. (2009) Explaining promotes discovery: Evidence from category learning. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1993). In J. C., Klagge, & A., Nordmann (Eds). Philosophical occasions 1912–1951. London: Blackwell.
  • Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 121138.
  • Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114, 245272.
  • Yamauchi, T., Love, B. C., & Markman, A. B. (2002). Learning non-linearly separable categories by inference and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 585593.
  • Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A. B. (1998). Category learning by inference and classification. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 124149.
  • Yarlett, D. (2008). Language learning through similarity-based generalization. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Stanford University.
  • Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 931959.
  • Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psychobiology of language. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least-effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.