SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bachtold, D., Baumuller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36(8), 731735.
  • Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 128.
  • Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape though? English and Mandarin speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive psychology, 43(1), 122.
  • Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 43(1), 185189.
    Direct Link:
  • Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579593.
  • Chen, J.-Y. (2007). Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001) Cognition, 104, 427436.
  • Chun, L. (1997a). A cognitive approach to UP metaphors in English and Chinese: What do they reveal about the English mind and the Chinese mind? Research degree progress report for Hong Kong Polytechnic University, pp. 125140.
  • Chun, L. (1997b). Conceptualizing the world through spatial metaphors: An analysis of UP/DOWN vs. SHANG/XIA metaphors. Proceeding of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Clark, H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E.Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 2763). New York: Academic Press.
  • Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371396.
  • Dobel, C., Diesendruck, G., & Bölte, J. (2007). How writing system and age influence spatial representations of actions: A developmental, cross-linguistic study. Psychological Science, 18(6), 487491.
    Direct Link:
  • Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., & Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digit affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12(3), 415423.
  • Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87B95.
  • Ishihara, M., Keller, P. E., Rossetti, Y., & Prinz, W. (2008). Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex, 44, 454461.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lehrer, A. (1990). Polysemy, conventionality, and the structure of the lexicon. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 207246.
  • Maass, A., & Russo, A. (2003). Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events. Psychological Science, 14, 296301.
    Direct Link:
  • Nachshon, I. (1985). Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli. International Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 161174.
  • Nachshon, I., Argaman, E., & Luria, A. (1999). Effects of directional habits and handedness on aesthetic preference for left and right profiles. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 106114.
  • Núñez, R., Motz, B., & Teuscher, U. (2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the Ego- and Time-Reference-Point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 133146.
  • Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401450.
  • Santiago, J., Lupiáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 512516.
  • Scott, A. (1989). The vertical dimension and time in Mandarin. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 9, 295314.
  • Torralbo, A., Santiago, J., & Lupianez, J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30, 745757.
  • Traugott, E. (1978). On the expression of spatiotemporal relations in language. In J. H.Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language: Word structure, Vol. 3 (pp. 369400). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Crosscultural and developmental-trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515557.
  • Weger, U. W., & Pratt, J. (2008). Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental time-line. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 426430.
  • Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the REVERSE SNARC effect in English and in Arabic monoliterates, biliterates and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture. Special Issue: Psychological and Cognitive Foundations of Religiosity. 5(1–2), 165190.