SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abelson, R. P., & Kanouse, D. E. (1966). Subjective acceptance of verbal generalizations. In S.Feldman (Ed.), Cognitive consistency: Motivational antecedents and behavioral consequents (pp. 171197). New York: Academic Press.
  • Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Carlson, G. N. (1977). Reference to kinds in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.
  • Carlson, G. N. (1995). The truth conditions of generic sentences: Two contrasting views. In G. N.Carlson & F. J.Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 224237). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Carlson, G. N., & Pelletier, F. J. (1995). The generic book. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Cimpian, A. (in press). The impact of generic language about ability on children’s achievement motivation. Developmental Psychology, doi:10.1037/a0019655.
  • Cimpian, A., Gelman, S. A., & Brandone, A. C. (2010). Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 261276.
  • Cimpian, A., & Markman, E. M. (2008). Preschool children’s use of cues to generic meaning. Cognition, 107(1), 1953.
  • Cimpian, A., & Markman, E. M. (2009). Information learned from generic language becomes central to children’s biological concepts: Evidence from their open-ended explanations. Cognition, 113(1), 1425.
  • Cox, A. (2004). U.S. poised for epidemic West Nile year. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2004/HEALTH/05/03/wnv.outlook/ Accessed on November 15, 2009.
  • Cree, G. S., McNorgan, C., & McRae, K. (2006). Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 643658.
  • Dahl, Ö. (1975). On generics. In E. L.Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language: Papers from a colloquium sponsored by the King’s College Research Centre, Cambridge (pp. 99111). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Declerck, R. (1986). The manifold interpretations of generic sentences. Lingua, 68, 149188.
  • Declerck, R. (1991). The origins of genericity. Linguistics, 29, 79102.
  • Gelman, S. A. (1988). The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 6595.
  • Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Gelman, S. A. (2004). Learning words for kinds: Generic noun phrases in acquisition. In D. G.Hall & S. R.Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (pp. 445484). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gelman, S. A. (2009). Learning from others: Children’s construction of concepts. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 115140.
  • Gelman, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2007). Developmental changes in the understanding of generics. Cognition, 105(1), 166183.
  • Gelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., Rosengren, K. S., Hartman, E., & Pappas, A. (1998). Beyond labeling: The role of parental input in the acquisition of richly-structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63, Serial No. 253.
  • Gelman, S. A., Goetz, P. J., Sarnecka, B. W., & Flukes, J. (2008). Generic language in parent-child conversations. Language Learning and Development, 4, 131.
  • Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23, 183209.
  • Gelman, S. A., Star, J. R., & Flukes, J. E. (2002). Children’s use of generics in inductive inferences. Journal of Cognition and Development, 3, 179199.
  • Gelman, S. A., Taylor, M. G., & Nguyen, S. P. (2004). Mother-child conversations about gender: Understanding the acquisition of essentialist beliefs. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69, Serial No. 275.
  • Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38, 213244.
  • Gilson, C., & Abelson, R. P. (1965). The subjective use of inductive evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(3), 301310.
  • Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42(3), 237288.
  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P.Cole & J. L.Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3 (pp. 4158). New York: Academic Press.
  • Howell, D. C. (2009). Statistical methods for psychology, 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Jaswal, V. K., & Neely, L. A. (2006). Adults don’t always know best: Preschoolers use past reliability over age when learning new words. Psychological Science, 17(9), 757758.
    Direct Link:
  • Jönsson, M. L., & Hampton, J. A. (2006). The inverse conjunction fallacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 317334.
  • Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Khemlani, S., Leslie, S. J., & Glucksberg, S. (2009). Generics, prevalence, and default inferences. In N.Taatgen & H.Van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 443448). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Khemlani, S., Leslie, S. J., Glucksberg, S., & Rubio-Fernández, P. R. (2007). Do ducks lay eggs? How people interpret generic assertions. In D. S.McNamara & J. G.Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 395400). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Koenig, M. A., Clement, F., & Harris, P. L. (2004). Trust in testimony: Children’s use of true and false statements. Psychological Science, 15, 694698.
    Direct Link:
  • Lawler, J. M. (1973). Studies in English generics. University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics, 1(1), 1184.
  • Leslie, S. J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. Philosophical Review, 117(1), 147.
  • Levin, J. R., Serlin, R. C., & Seaman, M. A. (1994). A controlled, powerful multiple-comparison strategy for several situations. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 153159.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • LoBue, V. (2009). More than just another face in the crowd: Superior detection of threatening facial expressions in children and adults. Developmental Science, 12(2), 305313.
  • LoBue, V., & DeLoache, J. S. (2010). Superior detection of threat-relevant stimuli in infancy. Developmental Science, 13(1), 221228.
  • Murphy, G. L. (2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289316.
  • Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 381396.
  • Osherson, D. N., Smith, E. E., Wilkie, O., Lopez, A., & Shafir, E. (1990). Category-based induction. Psychological Review, 97(2), 185200.
  • Prasada, S. (2000). Acquiring generic knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 6672.
  • Prasada, S., & Dillingham, E. M. (2006). Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception. Cognition, 99, 73112.
  • Rhodes, M., Brickman, D., & Gelman, S. A. (2008). Sample diversity and premise typicality in inductive reasoning: Evidence for developmental change. Cognition, 108, 543556.
  • Rips, L. J. (1975). Inductive judgments about natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 665681.
  • Sloman, S. A. (1993). Feature-based induction. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 231280.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90(4), 293315.
  • Yamauchi, T. (2005). Labeling bias and categorical induction: Generative aspects of category information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 538553.
  • Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A. B. (2000). Inference using categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 776795.