SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B, 364, 12811289.
  • Beck, D. M., & Kastner, S. (2009). Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain. Vision Research, 49, 11541165.
  • Bichot, N. P., & Rossi, A. F. (2005). Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in Macaque Area V4. Science, 308(5721), 529534.
  • Bichot, N. P., Schall, J., & Thompson, K. (1996). Visual feature selectivity in frontal eye fields induced by experience in mature macaques. Nature, 381, 697699.
  • Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 177(4043), 7780.
  • Billman, D., & Heit, E. (1989). Observational learning from internal feedback: A simulation of an adaptive learning method. Cognitive Science, 12, 587625.
  • Billman, D., & Knutson, J. (1996). Unsupervised concept learning and value systematicity: A complex whole aids learning the parts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(2), 458475.
  • Blaga, O. M., & Colombo, J. (2006). Visual processing and infant ocular latencies in the overlap paradigm. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 10691076.
  • Booth, A. E., & Waxman, S. R. (2002). Word learning is ‘smart’: Evidence that conceptual information affects preschoolers’ extension of novel words. Cognition, 84, B11B22.
  • Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 122.
  • Bott, L., Hoffman, A., & Murphy, G. (2007). Blocking in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 685699.
  • Bowerman, M. (1996). Cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In J. J.Gumperz & S. C.Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145186). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005). Interfering neighbours: The impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words. Cognition, 97, B45B54.
  • Boyce, S. J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Effect of background information on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 556566.
  • Boynton, G. M. (2009). A framework for describing the effects ofattention on visual responses. Vision Research, 49, 11291143.
  • Brady, T. F., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 798815.
  • Cepeda, N. J., Kramer, A. F., & De Sather, J. (2001). Changes in executive control across the life span: Examination of task switching performance. Developmental Psychology, 37, 715730.
  • Chapman, G. B., & Robbins, S. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment. Memory & Cognition, 18(5), 537545.
  • Chatham, C. H., Frank, M. J., & Munakata, Y. (2009). Pupillometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(14), 55295533.
  • Chelazzi, L. et al. (1993). A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature, 363, 345347.
  • Chelazzi, L. et al. (1998). Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 29182940.
  • Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1995). Complex adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians: Causality, continqency, and prediction. In H. L.Roitblat & J.Meyer (Eds.), Comparative approaches to Cognitive Science (pp. 271302 . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83121.
  • Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 2871.
  • Chun, M. M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2007). Interactions between attention and memory. Current opinion in Neurobiology, 17, 177184.
  • Cimpian, A., & Markman, E. (2005). The absence of a shape bias in children’s word learning. Developmental Psychology, 41, 10031019.
  • Clohessy, A. B., Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2001). Development of the functional visual field. Acta Psychologica, 106, 5168.
  • Colombo, J. (2001). The development of visual attention in infancy. In S. T.Fiske, D. L.Schacter, & C.Zahn-Waxler (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (pp. 337367). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
  • Colunga, E. (2006). The effect of priming on preschooler’s extensions of novel words: How far can “dumb” processes go? Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 23, 96106.
  • Colunga, E., & Smith, L. B. (2004). Dumb mechanisms make smart concepts. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 26, 239244.
  • Colunga, E., & Smith, L. B. (2005). From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: A role for associative learning. Psychological Review, 112(2), 347382.
  • Colunga, E., & Smith, L. B. (2008). Flexibility and variability: Essential to human cognition and the study of human cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 26, 174192.
  • Colunga, E., Smith, L. B., & Gasser, M. (2009). Correlation versus prediction in children’s word learning: Cross-linguistic evidence and simulations. Language and Cognition, 1(2), 197217.
  • Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 668687.
  • Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 18, 193222.
  • Dewar, K., & Xu, F. (2009) Do early nouns refer to kinds or distinct shapes? Evidence from 10-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 20, 252257.
    Direct Link:
  • Diamond, A. (2006). The early development of executive functions. In E.Bialystok & F. I. M.Craik (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change (pp. 7095). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Diesendruck, G., & Bloom, P. (2003). How specific is the shape bias? Child Development, 74, 168178.
  • Duncan, J. (1996). Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. In T.Inui & J. L.McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI (pp. 549578). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in LZ acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27 (2), 164194.
  • Fernald, A., Thorpe, K., & Marchman, V. (2010). Blue car, red car: Developing efficiency in online interpretation of adjective–noun phrases. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 190217.
  • Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. L., & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. In I.Sekerina, E.Fernández, & H.Clahsen (Eds.), Language processing in children (pp. 97135). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
  • Gathercole, V., Cramer, L., Somerville, S., & Jansen op de Haar, M. (1995). Ontological categories and function: Acquisition of new names. Cognitive Development, 10, 225251.
  • Gathercole, V., & Min, H. (1997). Word meaning biases or language-specific effects? Evidence from English, Spanish and Korean. First Language, 17(49 Pt 1), 3156.
  • Gathercole, V., Thomas, E. M., & Evans, D. (2000). What’s in a noun? Welsh-, English-, and Spanish-speaking children see it differently. First Language, 20, 5590.
  • Gelman, R. (1990). First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and animate-inanimate distinction as examples. Cognitive Science, 14, 79106.
  • Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1991). Language and categorization: The acquisition of natural kind terms. In S. A.Gelman & J. P.Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 146196). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relational relativity and early word learning. In M.Bowerman & S.Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 215256). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gilbert, C., Ito, M., Kapadia, M., & Westheimer, G. (2000). Interactions between attention, context and learning in primary visual cortex. Vision Research, 40, 12171226.
  • Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review Neuroscience, 30, 535574.
  • Goldberg, M., Maurer, D., & Lewis, T. (2001). Developmental changes in attention: The effects of endogenous cueing and of distractors. Developmental Science, 4, 209219.
  • Goldstone, R. L. (1998). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 585612.
  • Golinkoff, R. M., Mervis, C. B., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1994). Early object labels: The case for a developmental lexical principles framework. Journal of Child Language, 21(1), 125155.
  • Grossberg, S. (1982). Processing of expected and unexpected events during conditioning and attention: A psychophysiological theory. Psychological Review, 89(5), 529572.
  • Grossmann, T., & Farroni, T. (2009). Decoding social signals in the infant brain: A look at eye gaze perception. In M.De Haan & M. R.Gunnar (Eds.), Handbook of developmental social neuroscience (pp. 87106). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Halberda, J. (2006). Is this a dax which I see before me? use of the logical argument disjunctive syllogism supports word-learning in children and adults. Cognitive Psychology, 53(4), 310344.
  • Hall, D. G. (1996). Naming solids and non-solids: Children’s default construals. Cognitive Development, 11, 229264.
  • Hanania, R., & Smith, L. B. (in press). Selective attention and attention switching: Towards a unified developmental approach. Developmental Science.
  • Hirotani, M., Stets, M., Striano, T., & Friederici, A. D. (2009). Joint attention helps infants learn new words: Event-related potential evidence. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 20(6), 600605.
  • Hollich, G. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., Brand, R. J., Brown, E., Chung, H. L., Hennon, E., & Rocroi, C. (2000). Breaking the language barrier: An emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning. Monographs of the society for Research in child Development, 65(3), v123.
  • Horst, J., Scott, E., & Pollard, J. (in press). The role of competition in word learning via referent selection. Developmental Science.
  • Iannucci, J. E. (1952). Lexical number in Spanish nouns with reference to their English equivalents, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
  • Imai, M., & Gentner, D. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62, 169200.
  • James, W. (1980). The Principles of psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Asymmetric object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 895918.
  • Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2003). Contextual cueing: Reciprocal influences between attention and implicit learning. In L.Jiménez (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 277296). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Jiang, Y., & Leung, A. W. (2005). Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 100106.
  • Jiang, Y., Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 683702.
  • Jones, S. S., & Smith, L. B. (1998). How children name objects with shoes. Cognitive Development, 13, 323334.
  • Jones, S. S., & Smith, L. B. (2002). How children know the relevant properties for generalizing object names. Developmental Science, 5, 219232.
  • Jones, S. S., Smith, L. B., & Landau, K. B. (1991). Object properties and knowledge in early lexical learning. Child Development, 62, 499516.
  • Jonides, J. (1980). Towards a model of the mind’s eye’s movement. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 103112.
  • Kamin, L. J. (1968). ‘Attention-like’ processes in classical conditioning. In M. R.Jones (Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: Aversive stimulation (pp. 933). Coral Gagbles, FL: University of Miami Press.
  • Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A.Campbell & R. M.Church (Eds.), Punishment (pp. 279296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Kastner, S. et al. (1999). Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron, 22, 751761.
  • Keil, F. (1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In L.Hirschfeld & S.Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234254). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83, B35B42.
  • Kobayashi, H. (1998). How 2-year-old children learn novel part names of unfamiliar objects. Cognition, 68, B41B51.
  • Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 2244.
  • Kruschke, J. K. (1996). Base rates in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 326.
  • Kruschke, J. K. (2001). Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45(6), 812863.
  • Kruschke, J. K. (2005). Learning involves attention. In G.Houghton (Ed.), Connectionist models in cognitive psychology, Ch. 4 (pp. 113140). Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Kruschke, J. K., & Blair, N. J. (2000). Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention. Psycholonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(4), 636645.
  • Kruschke, J. K., & Johansen, M. K. (1999). A model of probabilistic category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognitive, 25(5), 10831119.
  • Kruschke, J. K., Kappenman, E. S., & Hetrick, W. P. (2005). Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 830845.
  • Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299321.
  • Landau, K. B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. (1998). Object perception and object naming in early development. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 1924.
  • Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Czyzewska, M. (1992). Nonconscious acquisition of knowledge. American Psycholgoist, 47(6), 796801.
  • Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Czyzewska, M. (1997). Hidden covariation detection: A fundamental and ubiquitous phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(1), 221228.
  • Lubow, R. E. (1997). Latent inhibition as a measure of learned inattention: Some problems and solutions. Behavioural Brain Research Special Issue: Psychobiology of Learned Inattention, 88(1), 7583.
  • Lubow, R. E., & Kaplan, O. (1997). Visual search as a function of type of prior experience with target and distractor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and performance, 23(1), 1414.
  • Lubow, R. E., & Moore, A. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: The effect of nonreinforced preexposure to the conditioned stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 415419.
  • Ludwig, C. J. H., Gilchrist, I. D., & McSorley, E. (2005). The remote distractor effect in saccade programming: Channel interactions and lateral inhibition. Vision Research, 45(9), 11771190.
  • Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276298.
  • Mackintosh, N. J. (1976). Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 186192.
  • Mackintosh, N. J., & Turner, C. (1971). Blocking as a function of novelty of CS and predictability of UCS. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 359366.
  • Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorization and naming in children: Problems of induction. MIT Series in learning, development, and conceptual change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Markman, E. M. (1990). Constraints children place on word meaning. Cognitive Science, 14, 5777.
  • Maunsell, J. H. R., & Treue, S. (2006). Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends in Neuroscience, 29(6), 317322.
  • Mayor, J., & Plunkett, K. (2010). A neurocomputational account of taxonomic responding and fast mapping in early word learning. Psychological Review, 117(1), 131.
  • McClelland, J. L., & Rogers, T. T. (2003). The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition. Nature Review Neuroscience, 4(4), 310322.
  • McPherson, L. (1991). A little goes a long way: Evidence for a perceptual basis of learning for the noun categories COUNT and MASS. Journal of Child Language, 18, 315338.
  • Medin, D. L., Altom, M. W., Edelson, S. M., & Freko, D. (1982). Correlated symptoms and simulated medical classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognitive, 8(1), 3750.
  • Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85(3), 207238.
  • Miller, J. L., Ables, E. M., King, A. P., & West, M. J. (2009). Different patterns of contingent stimulation differentially affect attention span in prelinguistic infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 32(3), 254261.
  • Mintz, T. H., & Gleitman, L. R. (2002). Adjectives really do modify nouns: The incremental and restricted nature of early adjective acquisition. Cognition, 84(3), 267293.
  • Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9(3), 273302.
  • O’Reilly, R. C. (2001). Generalization in interactive networks: The benefits of inhibitory competition and Hebbian learning. Neural Computation, 13, 11991242.
  • Pessoa, L., Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of attention: From modulation of sensory processing to top-down control. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(10), 39903998.
  • Posner, M., & Raichle, M. (1994). Images of mind. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  • Posner, M., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Research on attention as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 123.
  • Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K., Thomas-Thrapp, L., & Gerardi, G. (1998). The development of orienting to locations and objects. In R. D.Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 269288). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ramscar, M., Yarlett, D., Dye, M., Denny, K., & Thorpe, K. (in press). Feature-label-order effects and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognitive Science.
  • Regier, T. (2005). The emergence of words: Attentional learning in form and meaning. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29(6), 819865.
  • Reid, V. M., Striano, T., Kaufman, J., & Johnson, M. H. (2004). Eye gaze cueing facilitates neural processing of objects in 4-month-old infants. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 15(16), 25532555.
  • Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H.Black & W. F.Prokasy (Eds.), Classical Conditioning II (pp. 6499). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Reynolds, J. H., & Heeger, D. J. (2009). The normalization model of attention. Neuron, 61, 168185.
  • Richards, J. E. (2005). Localizing cortical sources of event-related potentials in infants’ covert orienting. Developmental Science, 8(3), 255278.
  • Richards, J. E. (2008). Attention in young infants: A developmental psychophysiological perspective. In C. A.Nelson & M.Luciana (Eds.), Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.) pp. 479497). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rossi, A. F., & Paradiso, M. A. (1995). Feature-specific effects of selective visual attention. Vision Research, 35(5), 621634.
  • Samuelson, L. (2002). Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15-20-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 38, 10161037.
  • Samuelson, L. K., Horst, J. S., Schutte, A. R., & Dobbertin, B. (2008). Rigid thinking about deformables: Do children sometimes overgeneralize the shape bias? Journal of Child Language, 35, 559589.
  • Samuelson, L. K., Schutte, A. R., & Horst, J. S. (2009). The dynamic nature of knowledge: Insights from a dynamic field model of children’s novel noun generalizations. Cognition, 110, 322345.
  • Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B. (1999). Early noun vocabularies: Do ontology, category structure, and syntax correspond? Cognition, 73(1), 133.
  • Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B. (2000a). Children’s attention to rigid and deformable shape in naming and no naming tasks. Child Development, 71(6), 15551570.
  • Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B. (2000b). Grounding development in cognitive processes. Child Development, 71, 98106.
  • Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 166.
  • Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contigency judgement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 121.
  • Shanks, D. R., Channon, S., Wilkinson, L., & Curran, H. V. (2006). Disruption of sequential priming in organic and pharmacalogical amnesia: A role for the medial temporal lobes in implicit contextual learning. Neuropsychopharmacology, 31(8), 17681776.
  • Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, auotmatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127190.
  • Sloutsky, V. M., & Fisher, A. V. (2008). Attentional learning and flexible induction: How mundane mechanisms give rise to smart behaviors. Child Development, 79, 639651.
  • Sloutsky, V. M., & Robinson, C. W. (2008). The role of words and sounds in infants’ visual processing: From overshadowing to attentional tuning. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32(2), 342365.
  • Smith, L. B. (1995). Self-organizing processes in learning to learn words: Development is not induction. In C.Nelson (Ed..), Basic and applied perspectives on learning, cognition, and development, Vol. 28 (pp. 132). Marwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Smith, S. E., & Chatterjee, A. (2008). Visuospatial attention in children. Neurological Review, 65, 12841288.
  • Smith, L. B., Colunga, E., & Yoshida, H. (2003). Making an ontology: Cross-linguistic evidence. In D.Rakison & L.Oakes (Eds.), Early category and concept development: Making sense of the blooming, buzzing confusion (pp. 275302). London: Oxford University Press.
  • Smith, L. B., & Gasser, M. (2005). The development of embodied cognition: Six lessons from babies. Artificial. Life, 11, 1339.
  • Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., & Landau, B. (1992). Count nouns, adjectives, and perceptual properties in children’s novel word interpretation. Developmental Psychology, 28, 273286.
  • Smith, L. B., Jones, S., Landau, B., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Samuelson, L. (2002). Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychological Science, 13(1), 1319.
    Direct Link:
  • Smith, L. B., & Samuelson, L. (2006). An attentional learning account of the shape bias: Reply to Cimpian and Markman (2005) and Booth, Waxman, and Huang (2005). Developmental Psychology, 42, 13391343.
  • Snyder, H. R., & Munakata, Y. (2008). So many options, so little time: The roles of association and competition in underdetermined responding. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 15, 10831088.
  • Snyder, H. R., & Munakata, Y. (2010). Becoming self-directed: Abstract representations support endogenous flexibility in children. Cognition.
  • Soja, N. N. (1992). Inferences about the meaning of nouns; the relationship between perception and syntax. Cognitive Development, 7, 2945.
  • Soja, N. N. (1994). Evidence for a distinct kind of noun. Cognition, 51(3), 267284.
  • Soja, N. N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1991). Ontological categories guide young children’s inductions of word meanings: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38(2), 179211.
  • Spitzer, H. et al. (1988). Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. Science, 240, 338340.
  • Summerfield, C., Egner, T., Greene, M., Koechlin, E., Mangels, J., & Hirsch, J. (2006). Predictive codes for forthcoming perception in the frontal cortex. Science, 314(5803), 13111314.
  • Swingley, D., & Aslin, R. N. (2007). Lexical competition in young children’s word learning. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 99132.
  • Treue, S., & Martinez Trujillo, J. C. (1999). Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature, 399, 575579.
  • Vouloumanos, A., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Infants’ learning of novel words in a stochastic environment. Developmental Psychology, 45, 16111617.
  • Walley, R. E., & Weiden, T. D. (1973). Lateral inhibition and cognitive masking: A neuropsychological theory of attention. Psychological Review, 80(4), 284302.
  • Ward, T. B., Becker, A. H., Hass, S. D., & Vela, E. (1991). Attribute availability and the shape bias in children’s category generalization. Cognitive Development, 6(2), 143167.
  • Waxman, S. R., & Markow, D. B. (1995). Words as invitations to form categories. Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 257302.
  • Williford, T., & Maunsell, J. H. (2006). Effects of spatial attention on contrast response functions in macaque area V4. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 4054.
  • Wu, R., & Kirkham, N. (in press). No two cues are alike: Depth of learning during infancy is dependent on what orients attention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.
  • Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature, 396, 7275.
  • Yoshida, H., & Hanania, R. (2007). Attentional highlighting as a mechanism behind early word learning. In D. S.McNamara & J. G.Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 719724. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Yoshida, H., & Smith, L. B. (2001). Early noun lexicons in English and Japanese. Cognition, 82, 6374.
  • Yoshida, H., & Smith, L. B. (2003a). Shifting ontological boundaries: How Japanese- and English- speaking children generalize names for animals and artifact. Developmental Science, 6(1), 134.
  • Yoshida, H., & Smith, L. B. (2003b). Correlation, concepts and cross-linguistic differences. Developmental Science, 6(1), 3034.
  • Yoshida, H., & Smith, L. B. (2005). Linguistic cues enhance the learning of perceptual cues. Psychological Science, 16(2), 9095.
    Direct Link:
  • Yoshida, H., Swanson, J., Drake, C., & Gudel, L. (2001). Japanese- and English-speaking children’s use of linguistic cues to animacy in category formation. Biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Younger, B. A., & Cohen, L. B. (1983). Infant perception of correlations among attributes. Child Development, 54, 858867.
  • Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (in press). What you learn is what you see: Using eye movements to study infant cross-situational word learning. Developmental Science.
  • De Zubicaray, G. I., & McMahon, K. L. (2009). Auditory context effects in picture naming investigated with event-related fMRI. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(3), 260269.