SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hove, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Anderson, J. R., & Schooler, L. J. (1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science, 2, 396408.
    Direct Link:
  • Andrews, S., & Scarratt, D. R. (1998). Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading non words: Hough dou peapel rede gnew wirds? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 10521086.
  • Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Berndt, R. S., Reggia, J. A., & Mitchum, C. C. (1987). Empirically derived probabilities for grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences in English. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 19, 19.
  • Bernstein, S. E., & Treiman, R. (2004). Pronouncing novel graphemes: The role of consonantal context. Memory and Cognition, 32, 905915.
  • Bishop, D. V. M. (2001). Genetic influences on language impairment and literacy problems in children: Same or different? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 189198.
  • Borgwaldt, S. R., Hellwig, F. M., & De Groot, A. M. B. (2005). Onset entropy matters—letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing, 18, 211229.
  • Bowman, M., & Treiman, R. (2008). Are young children logographic readers and spellers? Scientific Studies in Reading, 12, 153170.
  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organisation as a possible cause of reading backwardness. Nature, 271, 746747.
  • Brent, M. R., & Cartwright, T. A. (1996). Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition, 61, 93126.
  • Brighton, H., & Kirby, S. (2001). The survival of the smallest: Stability conditions for the cultural evolution of compositional language. In J.Kelemen & P.Sosík (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Artificial Life (ECAL01) (pp. 592601). Prague, Czech Republic: Springer-Verlag.
  • Brown, G. D. A., & Deavers, R. P. (1999). Units of analysis in nonword reading: Evidence from children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 208242.
  • Brown, I. S., & Felton, R. H. (1990). Effects of instruction on beginning reading skills in children at risk for reading disability. Reading and Writing, 2, 223241.
  • Bruck, M., & Treiman, R. (1992). Learning to pronounce words: The limitations of analogies. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 374388.
  • Bryant, P. E. (1998). Sensitivity to onset and rhyme does predict young children’s reading: A comment on Muter, Hulme, Snowling, and Taylor (1997). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 2937.
  • Bryant, P. E., Maclean, M., Bradley, L. L., & Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26, 429438.
  • Carroll, J. M., Snowling, M., Hulme, C., & Stevenson, J. (2003). The development of phonological awareness in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 39, 913923.
  • Chater, N. (1996). Reconciling simplicity and likelihood principles in perceptual organization. Psychological Review, 103, 566581.
  • Chater, N. (1997). Simplicity and the mind. Psychologist, 10, 495498.
  • Chater, N. (1999). The search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 273302.
  • Chater, N. (2004). What can be learned from positive data? Insights from an ‘ideal learner’. Commentary on ‘a multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition’ by Brian MacWhinney. Journal of Child Language, 31, 915918.
  • Chater, N. (2005). A minimum description length principle for perception. In M.Pitt & I.Myung (Eds.), Advances in minimum description length: Theory and applications (pp. 385409). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chater, N., & Vitányi, P. M. B. (2003). Simplicity: A unifying principle in cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 1922.
  • Christensen, C. A., & Bowey, J. A. (2005). The efficacy of orthographic rime, grapheme–phoneme correspondence, and implicit phonics approaches to teaching decoding skill. Scientific Studies in Reading, 9, 327349.
  • Christiansen, M. H., Allen, J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Learning to segment speech using multiple cues: A connectionist model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 221268.
  • Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589608.
  • Cossu, G., Gugliotta, M., & Marshall, J. C. (1995). Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two non-parallel processes? Reading and Writing, 7, 922.
  • Davies, A., & Ritchie, D. (2003). Teaching THRASS whole-picture keyword phonics: The essential guide to progression and assessment for all teachers of English (THRASS: teaching handwriting, reading and spelling skills). UK: THRASS.
  • Dowman, M. (2000). Addressing the learnability of verb subcategorizations with Bayesian inference. In L. R.Gleitman & A. K.Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 107112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (2000). A small-to-large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 10811103.
  • Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. B.Gough, L. C.Ehri & R.Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L.Metsala & L. C.Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 340). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393447.
  • Ellefson, M., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2009). Learning to label letters by sounds or names: A comparison of England and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 323341.
  • Ellis, N. C., & Hooper, A. M. (2001). Why learning to read is easier in welsh than in english: Orthographic transparency effects evinced with frequency-matched tests. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 571599.
  • Ellison, T. M. (1992). The machine learning of phonological structure. Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Australia.
  • Feldman, J. (2000). Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning. Nature, 407, 630633.
  • Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E.Patterson, J. C.Marhsall & M.Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301330). London: Erlbaum.
  • Frith, U., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies in Reading, 2, 3154.
  • Goldsmith, J. A. (2001). Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. Computational Linguistics, 27, 153198.
  • Goldsmith, J. A. (2002). Probabilistic models of grammar: Phonology as information minimization. Phonological Studies, 5, 2146.
  • Goldsmith, J. A. (2007). Probability for linguists. Mathematiques et Sciences Humaines, 180, 7398.
  • Goldsmith, J. A., & Riggle, J. (in press). Information theoretic approaches to phonological structure: The case of Finnish vowel harmony. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
  • Gontijo, P. F. D., Gontijo, I., & Shillcock, R. (2003). Grapheme-phoneme probabilities in British English. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 35, 136157.
  • Goswami, U. (1986). Children’s use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 7383.
  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & de Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 1952.
  • Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C., & Treiman, R. (1992). Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Greaney, K. T., Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (1997). Effects of rime-based orthographic analogy training on the word recognition skills of children with reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 645651.
  • Hahn, U., Chater, N., & Richardson, L. B. (2003). Similarity as transformation. Cognition, 87, 132.
  • Hanley, J. R., Masterson, J., Spencer, L. H., & Evans, D. (2004). How long do the advantages of learning to read a transparent orthography last? An investigation of the reading skills and reading impairment of Welsh children at 10 years of age. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 13931410.
  • Haskell, D. W., Foorman, B. R., & Swank, P. R. (1992). Effects of three orthographic/phonological units on first-grade reading. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 4049.
  • Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.
  • Hulme, C., Hatcher, P. J., Nation, K., Brown, A., Adams, J., & Stuart, G. (2002). Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 228.
  • Hulme, C., Muter, V., & Snowling, M. (1998). Segmentation does predict early progress in learning to read better than rhyme: A reply to Bryant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 3944.
  • Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Wimmer, H., & Zorzi, M. (2004). Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages? Cognition, 91, 273296.
  • Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (1997). Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 295311.
  • Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2001). Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 592617.
  • Kolmogorov, A. N. (1965). Three approaches to the definition of the concept ‘quantity of information’. Problems in Information Transmission, 1, 17.
  • Landerl, K. (2000). Influences of orthographic consistency and reading instruction on the development of nonword reading skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 239257.
  • Laxon, V., Gallagher, A., & Masterson, J. (2002). The effects of familiarity, orthographic neighbourhood density, letter-length and graphemic complexity on children’s reading accuracy. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 269287.
  • Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10, 707710.
  • Levy, B. A., Bourassa, D. C., & Horn, C. (1999). Fast and slow namers: Benefits of segmentation and whole word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 115138.
  • Levy, B. A., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Beginning word recognition: Benefits of training by segmentation and whole word methods. Scientific Studies in Reading, 1, 359387.
  • Li, M., & Vitányi, P. M. B. (1997). An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
  • Lloyd, S. (1992). Phonics handbook (UK). A handbook for teaching reading, writing and spelling. Essex, UK: Jolly Learning.
  • Maclean, M., Bryant, P., & Bradley, L. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early-childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly-Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 255281.
  • Manis, F. R. (1981). Rule knowledge and acquisition of word identification skills in normal and disabled readers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
  • Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Welch, V., & Desberg, P. (1981). A cognitive-developmental approach to reading acquisition. In T. G.Wallar & G. E.Mackinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 3, pp. 199219). New York: Academic Press.
  • Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awarenesss and early reading ability. In J. L.Metsala & L. C.Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Monaghan, P., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). The differential contribution of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation. Cognition, 96, 143182.
  • Morrison, F. J. (1984). Reading disability: A problem in rule learning and word decoding. Developmental Review, 4, 3647.
  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Taylor, S. (1997). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 370396.
  • Muter, V., Snowling, M., & Taylor, S. (1994). Orthographic analogies and phonological awareness: Their role and significance in early reading development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 35, 293310.
  • Nation, K., & Hulme, C. (1997). Phonemic segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation, predicts early reading and spelling skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 154167.
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1998). Rational models of cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Onnis, L., Roberts, M., & Chater, N. (2002). Simplicity: A cure for overgeneralizations in language acquisition. In L. R.Gleitman & A. K.Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 720725). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1998). Quantitative analyses of orthography to phonology mapping in English and French. Available at: http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~acontent/OPMapping.html. Accessed on January 12, 2009.
  • Pelli, D. G., & Tillman, K. A. (2007). Parts, wholes, and context in reading: A triple dissociation. PLoS ONE, 2, e680.
  • Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problems in reading acquisition. In P. B.Gough, L. C.Ehri, & R.Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J., & Regier, T. (2006). Poverty of the stimulus? A rational approach. In R.Sun & N.Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 663668). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273315.
  • Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56115.
  • Porpodas, C. D., Pantelis, S. N., & Hantziou, E. (1990). Phonological and lexical encoding processes in beginning readers: Effects of age and word characteristics. Reading and Writing, 2, 197208.
  • Pothos, E. M., & Chater, N. (2002). A Simplicity Principle in unsupervised human categorization. Cognitive Science, 26, 303343.
  • Powell, D., Plaut, D., & Funnell, E. (2006). Does the PMSP connectionist model of single word reading learn to read in the same way as a child? Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 229250.
  • Rack, J., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Wightman, J. (1994). The role of phonology in young children learning to read words: The direct-mapping hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 4271.
  • Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 3174.
    Direct Link:
  • Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies in Reading, 11, 235257.
  • Rissanen, J. J. (1989). Stochastic complexity and statistical inquiry. Singapore: World Scientific Publishers.
  • Roberts, M., Onnis, L., & Chater, N. (2005). Acquisition and evolution of quasi-regular languages: Two puzzles for the price of one. In M.Tallerman (Ed.), Evolutionary prerequisites for language (pp. 334356). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Savage, R. S. (1997). Do children need concurrent prompts in order to use lexical analogies in reading? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 38, 235246.
  • Savage, R. S., Abrami, P., Hipps, G., & Deault, L. (2009). A randomized controlled trial study of the ABRACADABRA reading intervention program in Grade 1. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 590604.
  • Savage, R. S., & Stuart, M. (1998). Sublexical inferences in beginning reading: Medial vowel digraphs as functional units of transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69, 85.
  • Schwanenflugel, P. J., Morris, R. D., Kuhn, M. R., Strauss, G. P., & Sieczko, J. M. (2008). The influence of reading unit size on the development of Stroop interference in early word decoding. Reading and Writing, 21, 177203.
  • Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143174.
  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). The mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379423.
  • Shapiro, L. R., & Solity, J. (2008). Delivering phonological and phonics training within whole class teaching. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 597620.
  • Share, D. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151218.
  • Sinclair, J. M. (Ed.). (1987). Looking up. London: HarperCollins.
  • Solity, J., & Shapiro, L. R. (2008). Developing the practice of educational psychologists through theory and research. Educational and Child Psychology, 25, 119145.
  • Solity, J., & Vousden, J. I. (2009). Real books vs. reading schemes: A new perspective from instructional psychology. Educational Psychology, 29, 469511.
  • Spencer, K. A. (2009). Feedforward, -backward, and neutral transparency measures for British English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 220227.
  • Spencer, K. A. (2010). Predicting children’s word-reading difficulty for common English words: The effect of complexity and transparency. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 519543.
  • Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., & Bonnet, P. (1998). Reading and spelling acquisition in French: The role of phonological mediation and orthographic factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 134165.
  • Stuart, M. (1999). Getting ready for reading: Early phoneme awareness and phonics teaching improves reading and spelling in inner-city second language learners. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 587605.
  • Stuart, M., Dixon, M., Masterson, J., & Gray, B. (2003). Children’s early reading vocabulary: Description and word frequency lists. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 585598.
  • Stuart, M., Masterson, J., & Dixon, M. (2000). Spongelike acquisition of sight vocabulary in beginning readers? Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 1227.
    Direct Link:
  • Stuart, M., Masterson, J., Dixon, M., & Quinlan, P. (1999). Inferring sublexical correspondence from sight vocabulary: Evidence from 6- and 7-year-olds. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 353366.
  • Torgerson, C. J., Brooks, G., & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling. (Research Report No. RR711). London: Department for Education and Skills.
  • Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Bick, S. (2003). Influence of consonantal context on the pronunciation of vowels: A comparison of human readers and computational models. Cognition, 88, 4978.
  • Treiman, R., Kessler, B., Zevin, J. D., Bick, S., & Davis, M. (2006). Influence of consonantal context on the reading of vowels: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 124.
  • Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljacbabic, R., & Richmondwelty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107136.
  • Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1988). Units in reading and spelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 466477.
  • Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1986). Experimental evidence for the effects of instructional bias on word identification. Exceptional Children, 53, 145155.
  • Vousden, J. I. (2008). Units of English spelling-to-sound mapping: A rational approach to reading instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 247272.
  • Vousden, J. I., Chater, N., Ellefson, M. R., & Solity, J. (2010, July). Comparing the content of English reading programs using the Simplicity Principle. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Society for the Scientific Studies of Reading, Berlin, Germany.
  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192212.
  • Wallace, C. S., & Freeman, P. R. (1987). Estimation and inference by compact coding. The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 49, 240265.
  • Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 133.
  • Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development—word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91103.
  • Wise, B. W., Olson, R. K., & Treiman, R. (1990). Subsyllabic units as aids in beginning readers’ word learning: Onset-rime versus poat-vowel segmentation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 119.
  • Woollams, A. M., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Plaut, D. C., & Patterson, K. (2010). SD-squared revisited: Reply to Coltheart, Tree, and Saunders (2010). Psychological Review, 117, 273283.
  • Wyse, D., & Goswami, U. (2008). Synthetic phonics and the teaching of reading. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 691710.
  • Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 329.
  • Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 11311161.