SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (1998). Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. Journal of Politics, 60, 634652.
  • Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? Journal of Politics, 70, 542555.
  • Barr, R. A., & Caplan, L. J. (1987). Category representations and their implications for category structure. Memory & Cognition, 15, 397418.
  • Barsalou, L. W. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U.Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101140). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barsalou, L. W. (1989). Intraconcept similarity and its implications for interconcept similarity. In S.Vosniadou & A.Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 76121). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barsalou, L. W. (1993). Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. C.Collins, S. E.Gathercole, & M. A.Conway (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 29101). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617645.
  • Dahlgren, K. (1985). The cognitive structure of social categories. Cognitive Science, 9, 379398.
  • Davis, T., & Love, B. C. (2010). Memory for category information is idealized through contrast with competing options. Psychological Science, 21, 234242.
  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2006). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.
  • Gelman, S. A., & Heyman, G. D. (1999). Carrot-eaters and creature-believers: The effects of lexicalization on children’s inferences about social categories. Psychological Science, 10, 489493.
    Direct Link:
  • Goldstone, R. L. (1996). Isolated and interrelated concepts. Memory & Cognition, 24, 608628.
  • Goldstone, R. L., Steyvers, M., & Rogosky, B. J. (2003). Conceptual interrelatedness and caricatures. Memory & Cognition, 31, 169180.
  • Greene, S. H. (2005). The structure of partisan attitudes: Reexamining partisan dimensionality and ambivalence. Political Psychology, 26, 809822.
  • Hayes, B. K., Heit, E., & Swendsen, H. (2010). Inductive reasoning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 278292.
  • Heit, E. (1994). Models of the effects of prior knowledge on category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 12641282.
  • Heit, E. (1998a). A Bayesian analysis of some forms of inductive reasoning. In M.Oaksford & N.Chater (Eds.), Rational models of cognition (pp. 248274). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Heit, E. (1998b). Influences of prior knowledge on selective weighting of category members. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 712731.
  • Heit, E. (2001). Putting together prior knowledge, verbal arguments, and observations in category learning. Memory & Cognition, 29, 828837.
  • Heit, E., & Barsalou, L. W. (1996). The instantiation principle in natural categories. Memory, 4, 413451.
  • Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jacobson, G. C. (2007). A divider, not a uniter: George W. Bush and the American people. New York: Pearson Longman.
  • Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307337.
  • Kemp, C., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009). Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 116, 2058.
  • Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago, MA: University of Chicago Press.
  • Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorization and naming in children: Problems in induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Medin, D. L., Lynch, E. B., & Solomon, K. E. (2000). Are there kinds of concepts?. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 121147.
  • Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289316.
  • Nicholson, S. P. (2005). Voting the agenda: Candidates, elections, and ballot propositions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 700708.
  • Osherson, D., Stern, J., Wilkie, O., Stob, M., & Smith, E. (1991). Default probability. Cognitive Science, 15, 251270.
  • Palmeri, T. J., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2001). Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 197235.
  • Rahn, W. M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 472496.
  • Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573605.
  • Ross, B. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1999). Food for thought: Cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 495553.
  • Sloman, S. A. (1993). Feature-based induction. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 231280.
  • Verbeemen, T., Vanoverberghe, V., Storms, G., & Ruts, W. (2001). Contrast categories in natural language concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 126.