SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baayen, H. R., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390412.
  • Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341345.
  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433436.
  • Chen, Y., & Gussenhoven, C. (2008). Emphasis and tonal implementation in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 724746.
  • Connine, C. M., Ranbom, L. J., & Patterson, D. J. (2008). Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 403411.
  • Cutler, A., & Weber, A. (2007). Listening experience and phonetic-to-lexical mapping in L2. In J.Trouvain & W. J.Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 4348). Dudweiler, Germany: Pirrot.
  • Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 222241.
  • Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 224238.
  • Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2006). Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 19501953.
  • Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Wong, N. K. U., Leung, W. H. Y., & Chu, P. C. Y. (2006). Extrinsic context affects perceptual normalization of lexical tone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 17121726.
  • Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 110125.
  • Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 11661183.
  • Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251279.
  • Goldinger, S. D. (2007). A complementary-systems approach to abstract and episodic speech perception. In J.Trouvain & W. J.Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 4954). Dudweiler, Germany: Pirrot.
  • Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434446.
  • Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K.Johnson & J.Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145165). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Klatt, D. (1989). Review of selected models of speech perception. In W. D.Marslen- Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 169226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? Cognitive Psychology, 51, 141178.
  • Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 262268.
  • Kraljic, T., Samuel, A. G., & Brennan, S. (2008). First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability. Psychological Science, 19, 332338.
    Direct Link:
  • Kuzla, C., Ernestus, M., & Mitterer, H. (2010). Compensation for assimilatory devoicing and prosodic structure in german fricative perception. In C.Fougeron & M.D’Imperio (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 10 (pp. 731758). Berlin: Mouton.
  • Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 98104.
  • Leather, J. (1983). Speaker normalization in perception of lexical tone. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 373382.
  • van der Linden, S., & Vroomen, J. (2007). Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 14831494.
  • Mann, V. A. (1980). Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 407412.
  • Maye, J., Aslin, R. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). The weckud wetch of the wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent. Cognitive Science, 32, 543562.
  • McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science, 30, 11131126.
  • Mitterer, H. (2006). Is vowel normalization independent of lexical processing? Phonetica, 63, 209229.
  • Moore, C. B., & Jongman, A. (1997). Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102 (3), 18641877.
  • Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189234.
  • Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204238.
  • Pierrehumbert, J. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In C.Gussenhoven & N.Warner (Eds.), Laboratory phonology VII (pp. 101139). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Pitt, M. A. (2009). How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 1936.
  • Samuel, A. G., & Kraljic, T. (2009). Perceptual learning for speech. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 12071218.
  • Wong, P. C. M., & Diehl, R. L. (2003). Perceptual normalization for inter- and intratalker variation in Cantonese level tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 413421.
  • Xu, Y. (1994). Production and perception of coarticulated tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 22402253.
  • Yu, A. C. L. (2007). Understanding near mergers: The case of morphological tone in Cantonese. Phonology, 24, 187214.