SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abbott, L., & Sejnowski, T. (1999). Neural codes and distributed representationsCambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bowers, J. S. (2009). On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: Implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience. Psychological Review, 116(1), 220251.
  • Carreiras, M., Dunabeitia, J. A., & Perea, M. (2007). Reading words, number and symbol. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(11), 454455.
  • Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic structures (2nd ed.). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Specialization within the ventral stream: The case for the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 22, 466476.
  • Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehéricy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Hénaff, M., & Michel, F. (2000). The visual word-form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123, 291307.
  • Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). Drc: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204256.
  • Dandurand, F., Grainger, J., & Dufau, S. (2010). Learning location invariant orthographic representations for printed words. Connection Science, 22(1), 2542.
  • Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (solar) model of visual word recognition. Doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Dissertation Abstracts International, vol. 62, p. 594.
  • Davis, C. J. (in press). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713758.
  • Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five theories of letter position coding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(2), 535557.
  • Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 335341.
  • Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Naccache, L., Ciuciu, P., Poline, J. B., LeBihan, D., et al. (2004). Letter binding and invariant recognition of masked words: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Psychological Science, 15(5), 307313.
    Direct Link:
  • Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 11031123.
  • Felleman, D., & Van Essen, D. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 1(1), 147.
  • Fischer-Baum, S., McCloskey, M., & Rapp, B. (2010). Representation of letter position in spelling: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 115(3), 466490.
  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680698.
  • Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115(3), 577600.
  • Grainger, J., Granier, J., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & Van Heuven, W. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865884.
  • Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1993). Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: Effects of positional letter frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(5), 951964.
  • Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518565.
  • Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P.Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: ‘‘Some words to talk about words“ (pp. 123), New York: Nova Science.
  • Gross, C. G. (2002). Genealogy of the ‘‘grandmother cell”. Neuroscientist, 8, 512518.
  • Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. I. (2008). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Cracking the Orthographic Code. A special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 117142.
  • Hannagan, T. (2009). Visual word recognition: Holographic representations and attractor networks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (p. 6). Paris: Université Paris.
  • Hannagan, T. (2010). Match calculations and priming simulations: The case of spatial coding. Available at: http://www.lscp.net/persons/hannagan/Material/MatchVsSim.pdf.
  • Hannagan, T., Dandurand, F., & Grainger, J. (in press). Broken symmetries in a location invariant word recognition network. Neural Computation.
  • Harris, H. (2002). Holographic reduced representations for oscillator recall: A model of phonological production. In W. D.Gray & C. D.Schunn (Eds.), The Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 423428). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517560.
  • Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). Mrom-p: An interactive activation, multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J.Grainger & A. M.Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 137.
  • Jordan, T., Thomas, S., Patching, G., & Scott-Brown, K. (2003). Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior and interior position in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 883893.
  • Kanerva, P. (1995). A family of binary spatter codes. In F. Fogelman-Soulié and P. Gallineri (Eds.), ICANN ’95: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (vol. 1, pp. 517522). Paris, France: EC2 & Cie.
  • Kanerva, P. (1997). Fully distributed representation. In Proceedings of the 1997 Real World Computing Symposium (Tokyo, Japan), pp. 358365.
  • Kanerva, P. (1998). Pattern completion with distributed representation. In IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN’98), II, pp. 14161421.
  • Knoblauch, A., & Palm, G. (2005). What is signal and what is noise in the brain? Biosystems, 79(1–3), 8390.
  • Levy, S., & Kirby, S. (2006). Evolving distributed representations for language with self-organizing maps. In P.Vogt (Eds.), Symbol Grounding and Beyond: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on the Emergence and Evolution of Linguistic Communication (pp. 5771). Berlin: Springer.
  • Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2009). Sandwich priming: A method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 618639.
  • Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed letter priming effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 93116.
  • McClelland, J., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights on the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419457.
  • McClelland, J., Patterson, K., Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. (2002). The past tense debate: Papers and replies by S. Pinker & M. Ullman and by J. McClelland & K. Patterson. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 456474.
  • McClelland, J., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. an account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375407.
  • Mozer, M. C. (1987). Early parallel processing in reading: A connectionist approach. 83104.
  • Mozer, M. C. (1991). The perception of multiple objects: A connectionist approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Neumann, J. (2002). Learning the systematic transformation of holographic reduced representations. Cognitive Systems Research, 3(2), 227235.
  • Norris, D. (2006). The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review, 113(2), 327357.
  • Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2008). The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 245264.
  • Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Transposed-letter priming effects for close vs. distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55, 397406.
  • Peressotti, F., & Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 691706.
  • Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate court? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition, 31, 829841.
  • Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can caniso activate casino? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231246.
  • Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.
  • Plate, T. A. (1995). Holographic reduced representations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 6 (3), 623641.
  • Plate, T. A. (2000). Randomly connected sigma-pi neurons can form associative memories. Network: Computation in neural systems, 11(4), 321332.
  • Plaut, D. C., & McClelland, J. L. (2010). Locating object knowledge in the brain: A critique of Bowers’ (2009) attempt to revive the grandmother cell hypothesis. Psychological Review, 117, 284290.
  • Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56115.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation In D. E.Rumelhart & J. L.McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing (Vol. 1, pp. 318362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & the P. R. Group. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 1. Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 333367.
  • Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523568.
  • Smolensky, P. (1990). Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 159216.
  • Smolensky, P., Legendre, G., & Miyata, Y. (1992). Principles for an integrated connectionist/symbolic theory of higher cognition (Tech. Rep. No. CU-CS-600-92). Department of Computer Science and Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.
  • Stevens, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 133151.
  • Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 49, 433460.
  • Tydgat, I., & Grainger, J. (2009). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 480498.
  • Van Assche, E., & Grainger, J. (2006). A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32(2), 399415.
  • Vinckier, F., Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Dubus, J., Sigman, M., & Cohen, L. (2007). Hierarchical coding of letter strings in the ventral stream: Dissecting the inner organization of the visual word-form system. Neuron, 55, 143156.
  • Waydo, S., Kraskov, A., Quiroga, R. Q., Fried, I., & Koch, C. (2006). Sparse representation in the human medial temporal lobe. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 1023210234.
  • Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The seriol model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221243.
  • Whitney, C. (2004). Investigations into the neural basis of structured representations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
  • Whitney, C. (2008). Comparison of the seriol and solar theories of letter position encoding. Brain and Language, 107(2), 170178.
  • Whitney, C., & Berndt, R. S. (1999). A new model of letter string encoding: Simulating right neglect dyslexia. In J. A.Reggia, E.Ruppin, and D.Glanzman (Eds.), Progress in brain research (vol. 121, pp. 143163). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Wickelgren, W. A. (1969). Auditory or articulatory coding in verbal short-term memory. Psychological Review, 76, 232235.
  • Ziegler, J. C. (1995). Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(5), 567593.