SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Archangeli, D., & Pulleyblank, D. (1994). Grounded phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary phonology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 36473658.
  • Clements, G. N. (2006). Feature organization. In K.Brown (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 433441). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
  • Dahan, D., Drucker, S. J., & Scarborough, R. A. (2008). Talker adaptation in speech perception: Adjusting the signal or the representations? Cognition, 108, 710718.
  • Donegan, P., & Stampe, D. (1979). The study of Natural Phonology. In D.Dinnsen (Ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory (pp. 126173). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Endress, A. D., & Mehler, J. (2010). Perceptual constraints in phonotactic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 235250.
  • Finley, S., & Badecker, W. (2009). Artificial language learning and feature-based generalization. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 423437.
  • Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Girard, F., & Konopczynski, G. (2006). Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 32, 12761293.
  • Hansson, G. O. (2008). Diachronic explanations of sound patterns. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 859893.
  • Hayes, B., & Steriade, D. (2004). The phonetic basis of phonological markedness. In B.Hayes, R.Kirchner, & D.Steriade (Eds.), Phonetically-based phonology (pp. 133). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • van der Hulst, H., & van de Weijer, J. (1995). Vowel harmony. In J.Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 495534). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Kraemer, M. (1998). A correspondence approach to vowel harmony and disharmony. Rutgers Optimality Archive 293. Available at http://roa.rutgers.edu. Accessed on November 8, 2010.
  • Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? Cognitive Psychology, 51, 141178.
  • Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 262268.
  • Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 115.
  • Kuo, L.-J. (2009). The role of natural class features in the acquisition of phonotactic regularities. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38, 129150.
  • Maye, J., Aslin, R., & Tanenhaus, M. (2008). The weckud wetch of the wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent. Cognitive Science, 32, 543562.
  • Moreton, E. (2008). Analytic bias as a factor in phonological typology. Phonology, 25, 83127.
  • New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE (A lexical database of contemporary French on internet: LEXIQUE). L’Année Psychologique, 101, 447462.
  • Nguyen, N., & Fagyal, Z. (2008). Acoustic aspects of vowel harmony in French. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 127.
  • Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204238.
  • Ohala, J. J. (1993). The phonetics of sound change. In C.Jones (Ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives (pp. 237278). London: Longman.
  • Onishi, K. H., Chambers, K. E., & Fisher, C. (2002). Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition, 83, B13B23.
  • Peperkamp, S., & Dupoux, E. (2007). The acquisition of abstract phoneme categories. In J.Cole & J.Hualde (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 9 (pp. 315338). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Peperkamp, S., Skoruppa, K., & Dupoux, E. (2006). The role of phonetic naturalness in phonological acquisition. In D.Bamman, T.Magnitskaia, & C.Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the BUCLD 30 (pp. 464475). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Pycha, A., Nowak, P., Shin, E., & Shosted, R. (2003). Phonological rule-learning and its implications for a theory of vowel harmony. In G.Garding & M.Tsujimura (Eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 22 (pp. 423435). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2008). Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 413425.
  • Schane, S. A., Tranel, B., & Lane, H. (1974). On the psychological reality of a natural rule of syllable structure. Cognition, 3/4, 351358.
  • Scott, D. R., & Cutler, A. (1984). Segmental phonology and the perception of syntactic Structure. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 450466.
  • Skoruppa, K., Lambrechts, A., & Peperkamp, S. (in press). The role of phonetic distance in the acquisition of phonological alternations. In Proceedings of NELS 39.
  • Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2009). The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 487501.
  • Warker, J. A., Xu, Y., Dell, G. S., & Fisher, C. (2009). Speech errors reflect the phonotactic constraints in recently spoken syllables, but not in recently heard syllables. Cognition, 112, 8196.
  • Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English (Vol. 1, 2, 3). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, C. (2006). Learning phonology with substantive bias: An experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science, 30, 945982.